The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
It is also understandable that German citizens (say) should be reluctant to underwrite "Greek Bail-outs" in the absence of structural reforms of the issues you list.
Where I am in agreement with you - and in radical disagreement with the MSM - is in my analysis of what those reforms should be. As you and others have noted, further austerity measures can result in ever increasing deflation and thus make the problem even worse. The solution, as far as I can see, has to be on the productivity side, and here the main barriers to progress are the things you mention: Corruption, Oligarchal control of the economy/polity, tax evasion, poor allocation of resources, under-investment in real productive assets etc.
Thus what Greece really needs is a social revolution - a radical modernisation of the productive base of the economy, a widening of the ownership of those means of production, an innovative approach to economic and social organisation, and an elimination of corruption, tax evasion, mis-allocation of public resources etc.
EU legislation on workers rights, human/political rights, transparency of contract allocation etc. can all help, but they still have to be implemented by Greeks. Hence the social revolution - the overthrow of the old corrupt oligarchy. We have had a similar - but apparently lesser - problem here in Ireland. At least we do have a relatively vibrant and modern industrial/service industry/knowledge economy base. The corruption was largely in the banking/building industry and related sectors. Some regularity reforms are being carried out and I doubt the financial/building sector will ever be allowed to run amok again.
But the bottom line is that these are still largely problems for US to resolve. The EU is at best a helpful external reference point and enabler - (and a bailer out on a short term basis). I would personally favour greater fiscal/economic integration across the EU if only as a means of imposing higher standards across the board - particularly for health care, workers rights, capital controls, education, building standards, banking regulation, auditing of public accounts, energy policy and provision, environment and climate change etc. But current EU Treaties don't take you very far in that direction, and expect Nationalists in other EU countries to resist all further integration - and not just in the UK, but perhaps increasingly Germany as well.
So whatever Merkel says about this being an existential crisis requiring greater EU integration, expect progress to be slow. Most of the problems will have to be resolved by the Irish/Greeks/PIIGS themselves. Don't borrow from international markets if you don't want them to rule your country...seems to be the long term lesson. But that means you have to get rid of the corrupt elites who benefit from the global financial games in the first place. What you say about patrons bribing their peons into complicity happens at the highest levels as well. There really is no substitute for integrity and accountability at all personal and systemic levels. An advancing polity/economy cannot progress without it.
Frank's Home Page and Diary Index
I doubt the financial/building sector will ever be allowed to run amok again.
...
So whatever Merkel says about this being an existential crisis requiring greater EU integration, expect progress to be slow. Most of the problems will have to be resolved by the Irish/Greeks/PIIGS themselves. Don't borrow from international markets if you don't want them to rule your country...seems to be the long term lesson.
Maybe Greece should have simply defaulted on its debt and taken the German banks down with it. That would have focused the mind of the German public on who is really being bailed out.
Now, this is clearly an existential crisis for the EU because the EU is after all predicated on a single international market for Goods, Services, Capital and Labour. Greece cannot insulate itself from the international markets without quitting the EU because it cannot institute capital controls between itself and the rest of the EU, as well as the EU being fully on board with the WTO's demand for removing barriers to capital flows between the EU and the rest of the world. By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
All you say is true but it's what we signed up for when we joined the EU and signed various Treaties. If Greece does want to leave, the Lisbon Treaty, for the first time, provides a mechanism for doing so. It appears to be generally accepted that Greece was accepted into the Euro based on falsified figures. You reap what you sow... A less inclusive Union might be talking about expelling Greece for so doing and endangering the currency Union as a whole.
There is a case for Greece leaving the Euro to enable a devaluation although I don't see how that addresses all the problems talos enumerates. Indeed it might perpetuate them by remove the pressure on the Oligarchy. It seems that it is Greece's oligrachy and systemic corruption that is its root problem and not membership of the EU/Euro which are probably more part of the solution than the problem longer term. Frank's Home Page and Diary Index
Current account deficits? Less certain, but still not entirely unlikely.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
Then the deficit chickenhawks would have to either back down or move for expulsion. And the chickenhawks have a blocking minority, but they don't have a qualified majority.
Doesn't matter, though, they still won't have a working majority.
You can't.
If the threat of expulsion from the relevant communities is not sufficient (and if the local population accepts the Greenbacks as payment for services rendered), the only way to stop them is sending in the gunboats.
But of course, if they are forcibly ejected from the -zone, they would have no particular reason to issue Greenbacks instead of just printing their own money.
But they can't print -notes or mint -coins without permission from the Bundesbank.
Well, actually they can, but the official EU stance would be that they were counterfeiting.
So, a default would free up about 30% of GDP in government expenses. Though, in terms of reducing deficit, only the interest payments would count.
So I'm not sure Greece couldn't make do just with the tax revenue. Plus, they could issue some sort of IOUs redeemable in payment of state taxes as a form of currency. By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
We are working through many issues regarding true democracy, transparency, accountability etc. in many member states. Tolerating it in one member state does the other members states no favours whatsoever.
In that sense the EU IS going through an existential crisis. The many areas of agreement and solidarity encoded in present Treaties have proved inadequate to deal with the Global banking/financial/economic/political crisis and the absence of sufficient fiscal integration and mutual oversight has proved key in this instance.
Other issues that perhaps need to be tackled on an EU wide basis include media monopolies/oligopolies, banking regulation, financial transaction taxes (Tobin Tax) etc. Even Merkel has recognised that existing Treaties are inadequate, but is it feasible to propose a new Treaty so soon after Lisbon? Expect national oligopies/bourgeoisies to go ape-shit, and not just in the UK. Frank's Home Page and Diary Index
yep, but the basis of solidarity has to be honesty, transparency, accountability, trust, reciprocity and mutuality.
And if the demands currently placed on Greece were about any or all of those things, nobody here would be complaining.
But they're not, so we are.
I recognise that we are talking about unequal relationships in many cases, but why should German taxpayers bail out Greek Oligarchs
What's happening right now is that the Greek taxpayers' children are bailing out the German oligarchs.
The "Greek bailout" is mostly a bailout of German banks, and the Greek taxpayers (and the Greek poor, through lack of public services) are going to pay for it (it's a loan, not a gift). A Greek default would be a bailout of the Greek (ordinary citizen and oligarch alike) at the expense of the German oligarchs.
Me, I fail to see the problem with fucking over some oligarchs - hence my acceptance of a default scenario.
(Similarly, capital controls is a way to prevent the Greek oligarchs from absconding from the country - they helped make the mess; they can damn well stick around for the cleanup.)
More generally, Greece will default unless either (1) Germany stops depressing domestic demand in the service of a mercantilist inflation policy (2) the EU establishes redistribution programmes that counteract the German mercantilism (which would effectively turn the German mercantilist policy into subsidy by the German taxpayer to the German export industries) (3) Greece imposes capital controls to bring its trade into balance.
The cash flows being what they are, there is no question about that fact. The only question is how much the Greek people are going to suffer first.
You mean the German taxpayer hasn't been already subsidizing the German export industries?
Let's look at German economic policy under both Schröder and Merkel:
So the German oligarch have already been bleeding the German people dry for at least a decade. Meanwhile, the German banks lent money to the peripheral economies so they could buy German products. In 2009 the German government has been busy bailing out the German banks.
It is impossible - unless you're a Serious Person - to take any pronouncements coming out of Germany seriously. By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
Yes. The German worker has. But the German taxpayer hasn't. Taxpayers include (in theory) the employers.
At the moment, the subsidy schemes are from workers to employers and from net importers to net exporters. A redistribution system that evened out the current account imbalances would add a redistribution scheme from taxpayers to export businesses on top of those.
And politicians no longer address themselves to workers but to taxpayers... By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
Oligarchs are extremely narrow-minded and selfish. Conservatives such as Merkel somewhat less so.
The EU is doomed by lack of solidarity in the face of any crisis (let alone one of the magnitude we're facing) as long as the EPP is the dominant political force, as it is currently.
Market worship has both been a cause of the crisis and a factor in making it worse.
There is also a moralistic undercurrent to all this, that somehow pain is virtuous. How Christian (Democrat). By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
The Greek debt problem is not new.
It has been there for a while.
In the interim, Greece and Germany traded favors. Greece received political support and Germany received huge orders from Greek on armaments and other projects.
Were Germany actually concerned about corruption and oligarchy in Greece, one place to begin nipping the Greeks in the bud would be: stop bribing them to buy your stuff.
This doesn't mean that Germans are to blame for Greek corruption, but the Germans certainly should not act surprised.
When you look at the banking crisis continentwide, a lot of dirty behavior seems to be tolerated by these leaders.
Over the next 10 years the BundesbankEU is going to cause a depression through Hooverite macro policy. By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
Jean-Claude Trichet vergleicht die Situation der Euro-Staaten zum Ende vergangener Woche mit der Zeit kurz nach dem Ausbruch der Finanzkrise: "Die Märkte funktionierten nicht mehr, es war fast wie nach der Lehman-Pleite im September 2008."
There are two considerations: Debt to GDP ratio and country size. Here's a picture of the Eurozone:
The diagonal lines are at 75%, 60% and 50% Debt-to-GDP ratio. 75% and 50% are the 1st and 3rd quartiles of the Eurozone, and 60% is the well-known Growth and Stability (suicide) Pact threshold.
Smaller countries are most vulnerable to a market run because it take less capital at risk to manipulate their debt market. Countries with a higher Debt-to-GDP ratio are also most vulnerable because the threat of default can be talked up more credibly.
It looks to me like Belgium and Portugal are next after Greece. Italy is an attractive target, but too large. Austria, the Netherlands and Ireland would be a second tier, of which Ireland has already capitulated and both bailed out their financial sector and engaged in "model" fiscal austerity.
Maybe looking at deficit would make Spain look more vulnerable, but on Debt and GDP, it is only a 3rd tier prey for the wolfpack. By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
There are three conditions that must be met to qualify as a target:
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2 4 comments
by gmoke - Sep 27
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 17
by Oui - Oct 7
by Oui - Oct 66 comments
by Oui - Oct 54 comments
by Oui - Oct 4
by Oui - Oct 41 comment
by Oui - Oct 31 comment
by Oui - Oct 24 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 24 comments
by Oui - Oct 214 comments
by Oui - Oct 120 comments
by Oui - Oct 124 comments
by Oui - Sep 30
by Oui - Sep 303 comments
by Oui - Sep 2819 comments
by Oui - Sep 28
by Oui - Sep 276 comments
by Oui - Sep 271 comment
by Oui - Sep 263 comments
by Oui - Sep 266 comments