Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
For example, what (roughly? exactly?) is the cost of a coal miner's life?  What is the cost of a gulf or two?  What are the long term costs of isotope storage, factoring in the cost of capital over a few millenia, give or take.

Thus it always comes down to the politics.

Ultimately we can only estimate, however that has benefits.

Why not require that companies engaged in harmful resource extraction like this be required to contribute 2.5% of revenues towards a compensation fund?

  1. This would billions to cover the costs created externalities from operations.

  2. Some portion could be used to fund the development of alternatives, including loan guarantees for renewables, etc.

And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
by ManfromMiddletown (manfrommiddletown at lycos dot com) on Thu May 20th, 2010 at 01:03:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:


Top Diaries

Occasional Series