The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I can only guess that the Neocons chose to support the lesser of two evils in this time period, but certainly Saddam had no use for Israel even then. But who cares. He was being used to attain American foreign policy goals, and the takedown of Iran was one, supported by Israel.
Still, I just don't believe that Walt's thesis can be so simply contradicted. It is almost impossible to name a prominent Neocon who is not a strong Israelophile and whose positions are not supportive of Israel in every way, or should I say, the right wing way. Neocons are Likudniks, pure and simple, from Perle on down, as evident in A Clean Break.
by gmoke - Mar 3
by rifek - Feb 24 4 comments
by Oui - Mar 1 4 comments
by Oui - Mar 1
by gmoke - Feb 25
by Oui - Mar 14 comments
by Oui - Feb 284 comments
by Oui - Feb 28
by Oui - Feb 2710 comments
by Oui - Feb 26
by Oui - Feb 262 comments
by Oui - Feb 25
by Oui - Feb 24
by rifek - Feb 244 comments
by Oui - Feb 23
by Oui - Feb 22
by Oui - Feb 222 comments
by Oui - Feb 21
by Oui - Feb 203 comments