The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Checking, I find it was a reply to a question explicitly asking whether the EU is prepared for the case of emergency.
The finance ministry issued its own denial, which was more double-talk-ish: they denied that there is a crisis by saying that the rescue package criteria of insolvency and a danger to the stability of the Euro do not exist, Spain could sell on capital markets successfully, and Spain has its own national bank bailout fund as first line of defense; but that's no denial of the claim that Spain asked for help. Whatever is going on here the movers are highly irresponsible.
Is a country that would have government officials spread damaging rumours about a fellow Eurozone country "on condition of anonymity" the weekend before a major public debt issue fit to be a member of the Eurozone, especially when said country is the Eurozone's largest economy and its bonds are the benchmark for ther countries'?
Dumping Germany from the Eurozone might be a fitting punishment for the German government and banking sector (though a default would be a much better punishment), but that won't achieve anything for the rest. If the benchmark of German bonds is gone, interest rates would climb further; other Eurozone members weren't too high on solidarity either; and specifically Spain's indebtednesss to germany is rivalled by that to France.
At any rate, I will wait until there are explicit and public signs from the two governments before I believe that this ferocious "Spain-Germany Cold War" visioned in Anglo media is really on the horizon. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
See Google Translate version.
Can we stop it with this assumption that Europe's problems are a figment of the imagination of the English-language press? It's a poor excuse. By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
But to the matter at hand: Why are we blaming Germany specifically? Is there anyone anywhere in power who has not yet declared austerity to be the height of both virtue and wisdom?
In this context:
I take the leaking as a sign of internal divisions more than anything else. It seems that Merkel managed to both rid herself of all possible rivals and demoralise her supporters. Some sniping is to be expected.
Not quite. The most obvious difference is an quotation by Nicolas Veron from Bruegel but there's also a summary of El Pais' own reporting from the previous week as well as other information not contained in the Reuters article.
As for the general editorialising tone of El Pais' coverage, there are things like Terrible management at German banks (google translate) By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
:: :: :: :: ::
As for the end of that article, in Google translate:
...And yet, once again, Germany will have the last word. Merkel gave her support "transparency" involving the testing, but also warned that "details" (which eventually will be released), "the finance ministers decided in Ecofin." In other words, it depends on what his minister Wolfgang Schauble decree on 13 July.
If I read this right, El País is insinuating that Merkel is foreshadowing that Schäuble will water down the transparency in a month. If that's the right reading, then I suspected a misinterpretation already from having read articles on the stress tests two days ago that criticised the EC for not fixing details, so I tried to track this down.
This is obviously an evasion of a question on specific details.
As for what Schäuble's ministry did on the stress test front after the EU summit: going beyond the "if you have nothing to hide..." argument (see this comment of mine), they look for ways to change German law that mandates the tested bank's approval for publication, and Schäuble gave an interview (to another business magazine, the interviewer of which is another automatically blaming Greeks and Spaniards for the situation) in which he insists that the risk of eventual bailouts in the wake of the publication is one to take, one for which the EU has funds ready, and claims that "we won't have to pay in the end" [speak: any run on a bank would be stopped with temporary liquidity injections that are repaid after the bankruptcy is averted]. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by gmoke - Nov 11
by gmoke - Nov 7
by gmoke - Nov 6
by gmoke - Oct 27
by Oui - Nov 11
by Oui - Nov 102 comments
by Oui - Nov 9
by Oui - Nov 8
by Oui - Nov 64 comments
by Oui - Nov 52 comments
by Oui - Nov 4
by Oui - Nov 24 comments
by Oui - Nov 2
by Oui - Nov 14 comments
by Oui - Oct 31
by Oui - Oct 301 comment
by Oui - Oct 2912 comments
by Oui - Oct 28