The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Resource austerity would mean to take into account the limits to growth arguments and pay the true cost of resource luxuries. Resource austerity also means more more room for jobs. It also means money inflation.
Money austerity comes from believing money is a real thing that is neither created nor destroyed, only conserved, instead of a consensual token. It is ridiculous that there are both human and physical resources (I'm referring to plant, not raw materials) going idle because of lack of fiat tokens. But that is the situation, and attemting to economize on tokens is only going to result in greater capacity underutilisation. The hoarders of tokens will keep their hoard and may even succeed in safeguarding the exchange value of their hoard, but not only will resource overuse not be checked, but there will be an economic slump. But at least there won't be inflation. By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
There are two kinds of austerity: money austerity and resource austerity.
Correct.
There may well be shortages - and hence a need for austerity - of 'money's worth'.
For instance land/location - which is the basis of more than two thirds of money in existence - is limited, and so are non-renewable resources of all kinds. In most countries land distribution is pretty 'austere' already, since a tiny proportion of the population owns most of it.
But in fact there can no more be a shortage of money than there can be a shortage of kilogrammes or metres.
It is only because we choose to use bank IOUs/credit objects/fiat tokens as 'money' - I prefer to call these monetary objects 'currency' - which means that there is a shortage of 'money'. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
But the insidious reality is that such a shortage of money can lead to people not being able to work exclusively on the basis of lack of money. It's as if you couldn't buy groceries at the market because the merchant has run out of kilogrammes. By laying out pros and cons we risk inducing people to join the debate, and losing control of a process that only we fully understand. - Alan Greenspan
How they expect to receive their stream of compounded interest payments from the unemployed is beyond me, but that seems to be their concern. She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
by gmoke - Apr 22
by Oui - Apr 221 comment
by Oui - Apr 22
by Oui - Apr 217 comments
by Oui - Apr 21
by Oui - Apr 20
by Oui - Apr 192 comments
by Oui - Apr 197 comments
by Oui - Apr 18
by Oui - Apr 17
by Oui - Apr 162 comments
by Oui - Apr 1618 comments
by Oui - Apr 156 comments
by Oui - Apr 14
by Oui - Apr 145 comments
by Oui - Apr 131 comment
by Oui - Apr 124 comments
by Oui - Apr 112 comments
by Oui - Apr 10
by Oui - Apr 93 comments