The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Remember, using resistance heaters with clean power is better than having a gas furnace, despite being an insanely wasteful use of electricity, and not everyone can use heat pumps.
In a (part-)nuclear grid, central heating can obviate this requirement.
For that matter, there is no good reason why we have to replace all current uses of fossil fuels with electricity: Heating requirements can be wholly obviated via appropriate architecture, even in Northern Finland in the winter; the need for transportation can be greatly abridged with improved city planning and settlement patterns; shipping can, for all non-perishable commodities, be powered by sail. The only major uses of fossil fuels I can think of off-hand are air travel (which will need to be replaced by trains and ships), industrial heat sources like furnaces and electricity generation for existing electricity demand.
This will kill the suburbs and radically alter the rural areas, of course. But our way of life is negotiable - the laws of physics are not.
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 9 81 comments
by ARGeezer - Jun 29 9 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 5 39 comments
by Oui - Jul 6 4 comments
by joelado - Jul 4 5 comments
by Oui - Jul 5 6 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jul 2 33 comments
by Oui - Jul 3 5 comments
by Oui - Jul 15
by Oui - Jul 141 comment
by ATinNM - Jul 126 comments
by joelado - Jul 11
by Oui - Jul 111 comment
by Oui - Jul 114 comments
by Oui - Jul 101 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 981 comments
by Oui - Jul 94 comments
by Oui - Jul 93 comments
by Oui - Jul 8
by Oui - Jul 64 comments
by Oui - Jul 63 comments
by Oui - Jul 56 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jul 539 comments
by joelado - Jul 45 comments
by Oui - Jul 41 comment
by Oui - Jul 35 comments