The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Two problems in this quote, the obvious lie is about potential power generation, which has been thoroughly destroyed in the post.
The second one is the choice of language "landscape covered in wind farms" implies that the land would be covered in windmills. This misleading description is designed to create a false image in peoples minds of the result of building the wind farms in Nebraska.
Truth is most of Nebraska, especially the purple part depicted in the US wind map linked in the post, is empty. Western Nebraska, along with Western Kansas, South Dakota and even further south, are areas that have been steadily losing population since the 1970's. Wind Power offers a measure of economic uplift to areas that have abandoned farming because it's too dry.
Wind power is a full win for everyone in this region of the US, and it is a crime that coal industry prostitutes like Ron Asche get to spout their BS in public.
Wow, well said. This state has the motherlode of a wind resource, and it's still not going to do squat about tapping it.
As Jerry was known to say, "got two good eyes and still can't see..."
Nb41
let's hope the utter untenability of their retrogressive stance on this (and so much else) has become fully visible to voters, come november! 'The history of public debt is full of irony. It rarely follows our ideas of order and justice.' Thomas Piketty
I'd bet there isn't one farmer or rancher in the entire state of Nebraska who wouldn't welcome turbines + revenue on his spread, unless he was already bought, or insane.
Though the coal industry does attract people who get off on real equipment, and think monster trucks are just for the rubes. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
Any possibility that a syndicate of wealthy Euorpean's bored of playing with derivatives and currency speculation might make an offer for the western part of the state? Too bad 300 GW can't be exported across the ocean. Maybe some exotic lease for most of the state? Just saying....
The Republic of Lakotah is in negotiations to establish its own energy company, and hopes to develop solar and wind power and sell surplus electricity to the United States. This would represent a continuation of projects in the past that have sourced renewable energy on tribal lands.[6]
It turns out that there is one one 115 kv line that goes through the Lakota lands, and that goes from the Missouri River (a dam run by the US Army Corps of Engineering) into Nebraska. NPPD owns the line, and are the customers for the electricity. The Lakota were trying to get the wind based electricity down to 2.9 c/kw-hr to meet the maximum price NPPD would tolerate. They came close but couldn't quite get there.
NPPD could have upped their price a touch to make up for past genocide, but no dice. So, no Lakota wind farm as there is just no way to get the electriciy product off to market. Oh well...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UnitedStatesPowerGrid.jpg#file
There is an intersection of 230 kv and a 345 kv in the center of South Dakota next to a big dam on the Missouri River. And all the coal burners in the region also need to be near a river for cooling water. And it is those coal burners that hog the output of the transmission lines, plus the dams on the Missouri.
What there really is a need for is a choice. Should those wires be used for existing, largely pollution based electricity, or renewables. And will the Missouri River be allowed to be the source of the water for pumped hydro storage, as well as deferred hydro.
And so looks like coal wins for now... It owns the lines..
by gmoke - May 16
by gmoke - Apr 22 5 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 23 3 comments
by gmoke - Apr 30
by Oui - May 1713 comments
by Oui - May 15
by Oui - May 1512 comments
by Oui - May 14
by Oui - May 136 comments
by gmoke - May 13
by Oui - May 1321 comments
by Oui - May 12
by Oui - May 119 comments
by Oui - May 11
by Oui - May 109 comments
by Oui - May 10
by Oui - May 921 comments
by Oui - May 9
by Oui - May 84 comments
by Oui - May 73 comments
by Oui - May 7
by Oui - May 63 comments