The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The emotional reason nuclear advocates come across as opposed to wind is much, much simpler, and far more potent; It is this: The expansion of the nuclear electricity industry got halted in its tracks 40 years ago by activists that promised us a future of wind and solar power. "A grid powered by nature by the year 2000" was their ideal, their slogan, and their promise to the world. Honestly. If I give you a time machine, and statistics of what power production look like today, and send you back to the founding of greenpeace, do you think you could convince them that solar is still effectively non-existant in 2010? that we are still burning coal?
Those guys had a vision, and they were wrong
It is now 2010, and the side that argued that we should replace king coal with the atom, and sooner, rather than later, are feeling really rather massively pissed off that people are still advancing that same vison as an alternative to the technology that we know, without a doubt, can get the job done. The gut reaction, the vision I get when I hear people advocating an all renewable future ? I do not think "That would be nice" I think "If these guys keep winning, 2060 will roll around, and the grid will still be 50% coal".
by gmoke - Apr 22 5 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 23 3 comments
by gmoke - Apr 30
by Oui - May 15
by Oui - May 14
by Oui - May 135 comments
by gmoke - May 13
by Oui - May 1321 comments
by Oui - May 12
by Oui - May 119 comments
by Oui - May 11
by Oui - May 109 comments
by Oui - May 10
by Oui - May 921 comments
by Oui - May 9
by Oui - May 81 comment
by Oui - May 73 comments
by Oui - May 7
by Oui - May 63 comments
by Oui - May 61 comment
by Oui - May 5
by Oui - May 58 comments