Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
What I think you would find is a telegraph net, that on the same landmass you would find more cables within areas controlled by the same state, then between such areas. Cables on the bottom of the oceans were rather few an expensive, and the only empire to control an international net reaching all parts of the world, was the British empire.

However, I bet the same - higher number of cables within political entity then between - can be said about the internet. For example, our own little branch of Echelon FRA collects data at the rather few nodes were traffic enters and exits Sweden.

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se

by A swedish kind of death on Fri Sep 17th, 2010 at 03:52:26 PM EST
[ Parent ]
And once you're running cables anyway, you might as well run more capacity than you expect to need: The marginal cost of doubling capacity if you're running cables anyway is much lower than retrofitting extra capacity on afterwards. So as long as somebody finds it worthwhile to run internet cables across borders or geographic boundaries, there's likely to be connection. And this is likely to be the case, considering that even during the coldest bits of the so-called "Cold War," Western Europe and the Soviet Union were running gas pipelines across what was probably the least permeable border of the time.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Fri Sep 17th, 2010 at 04:07:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]


Occasional Series