Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
The problem is that AV is not a proportional representation system. It is estimated that the Lib Dems will win a few more seats than under first past the post, but still nowhere near fair representation.

The value of AV is as a wedge to break the status quo. It is hoped that at some point in the next generation we could move to a more proportional system. On the other hand if AV became a new norm and there is no further movement, then the House of Commons and the political system will not be much altered.

It is hopeful that Ed Miliband has confirmed he supports AV and also did not go out of his way to attack the Lib Dems in his leader's conference speech. Perhaps he thinks that we are entering a period of coalition politics, so it is not wise to annoy any potential coalition partner.

I doubt the coalition will be brought to a premature end. It would not be in the Lib Dems interest to get a reputation as unreliable coalition partners or to annoy the Conservatives.

The Lib Dems are in the unusual position that they could easily form a coalition with either Labour or the Conservatives. Most smaller parties in most democracies are almost guaranteed allies for the largest centre-right or centre-left party. Preserving flexibility is therefore greatly to the advantage of the Lib Dems, but does mean they are not wholly predictable. This upsets people (like partisans of other parties or journalists) who would prefer a simpler political landscape.

by Gary J on Wed Sep 29th, 2010 at 06:29:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Gary J:
I doubt the coalition will be brought to a premature end.

I thought it was in the nature of British politics to end terms prematurely and call an election when the government (or in this case a part of the government) deems it appropriate. Is this a misunderstanding on my part?

Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se

by A swedish kind of death on Thu Sep 30th, 2010 at 03:54:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]
No, you have understood British political history. However when the fixed term Parliaments bill gets through Parliament the chances of an early election will be greatly reduced.

It is precisely to avoid one coalition party betraying the coalition, by forcing an early election, that the coalition agreement included fixed term Parliaments.

by Gary J on Fri Oct 1st, 2010 at 07:30:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]
that the larger party will promise electoral reform, and then find a way to renege on it.

I'm talking from bitter experience (PS/Verts in France). I hope I am wrong with respect to the UK : perhaps the Conservatives have more integrity than the PS (not counting on that), but more to the point, perhaps the Libs have the power / the guts to force it through (after reflection, I'm not counting on that either)

It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II

by eurogreen on Fri Oct 1st, 2010 at 09:38:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]
At the AV referendum next May it is likely that most Conservatives will vote no and most Lib Dem supporters will vote yes. That was understood to be the position when the coalition agreement was negotiated.

The key to the result is likely to be the way Labour splits. Many Labour activists and politicians love first past the post. It gives them more power than a fairer voting system would.

It is interesting that Ed Miliband, in his big conference speech, announced he would support AV.

It is not certain what the result of the referendum will be. AV is not a lost cause, as some people have feared.

by Gary J on Fri Oct 1st, 2010 at 03:06:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series