Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
is that CCS is not penalised by the price of carbon given that CCS emits no carbon (supposedly).

Wind power
by Jerome a Paris (etg@eurotrib.com) on Fri Jan 28th, 2011 at 09:42:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
But that CCS is more expensive that $60/ton

Keynesianism is intellectually hard, as evidenced by the inability of many trained economists to get it - Paul Krugman
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Fri Jan 28th, 2011 at 09:50:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It is at least saying that coal or gas with CCS (however they calculated costs for CCS...) will be (in 2025) costlier than coal or gas without it. And very considerably costlier than wind or nuclear. They're not doing CCS any favours.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Fri Jan 28th, 2011 at 12:36:37 PM EST
[ Parent ]
This is simply accuracy. CCS is inherently insanely expensive due to the massive quantities of carbon that needs storing - there is no cheap way to do that.
by Thomas on Fri Jan 28th, 2011 at 01:13:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Quite. But accuracy from Exxon-Mobil may be saluted.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sat Jan 29th, 2011 at 02:03:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series