Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Does the coral record studied go back only 1,800 years or are they saying that the last time they saw similar phenomena was 1,800 years ago?
by Jace on Tue Jan 4th, 2011 at 02:32:31 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The article says they have 1800 years of data based on 700-year-old coral reefs--so obviously the article is not telling us everything.  

The Fates are kind.
by Gaianne on Tue Jan 4th, 2011 at 02:52:57 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I saw that. This can an important distinction since at least some of the data suggests relatively moderate conditions at that time.
by Jace on Tue Jan 4th, 2011 at 03:09:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]
The article says that there is a report by a research group on study of data based on 700 year old coral reefs, and that one member of the group says that the Labrador Current has been dominant for nearly 2,000 year ~ it never says that that remark by that member of the group is based on the results of this study alone.

According to that dating, the establishment of the Labrador current would be around the time of the zenith of the Roman Empire, and if that dating is correct, the early centuries of the establishment of the Labrador Current was the Age of Migrations.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Mon Jan 10th, 2011 at 05:15:48 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series