Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Its your decision to view it as railing at character flaws, as that's not what I was doing.

I understand that that reading is more convenient for your argument, since pigeonholing what I said into a category for which you have an already established argument allows you to soapbox rather than discuss.

And while economic, geopolitical and sociological constraints determine the present terrain within with individual and community action takes place, it would be a quaintly 20th century approach to presume that they strictly determine the outcome, and to ignore the role of individual and community action in reproducing those constraints, and in so doing, shifting the boundaries of what is possible.

Take the US 2000 election, for example ~ the then members of the Green Party have every right to be upset at the strategic blunder from a Green Part perspective that Nader made in focusing his attention on swing states, when the tweedle dee and tweedle dum argument could have been made with far stronger total electoral effect for the growth of the Green Party if taken to the taken for granted states instead.

I've been accused of being a Marxist, yet while Harpo's my favourite, it's Groucho I'm always quoting. Odd, that.

by BruceMcF (agila61 at netscape dot net) on Mon Nov 21st, 2011 at 12:04:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:

JakeS 4


Occasional Series