The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The sovereign borrows in order to free hoarded gold for circulation
Under fiat money there's no reason for the government to borrow from the markets. Jake has called sovereign bond yields a subsidy on fmoney hoarding. To err is of course human. But to mess things up spectacularly, we need an elite — Yanis Varoufakis
An argument could be constructed that the government could control amount of money circulating by on one hand regulate the CB rate and the conditions it is borrowed out under, and on the other give the opportunity to park your money with the state to suck up money that is not invested. Then as a rule, the bond rate should be slightly below the CB rate (if it is over banks can borrow from CB and to government, which is just another bank subsidy, if it is far below you get a wide span where the profitability of investment does not depend on CB rate), and the amount that the government borrows should be irrelevant.
Can I have this argument chopped up now? Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
An argument could be constructed that the government could control amount of money circulating by on one hand regulate the CB rate and the conditions it is borrowed out under, and on the other give the opportunity to park your money with the state to suck up money that is not invested.
Yes. That's what interest rate policy does. Buying and selling government bonds is one way to enforce an interest rate policy (but neither the only nor the best one). Note also that interest rate policy is inherently destructive of economic activity: The CB can't create profitable investment opportunities where there are none, due to the zero bound on nominal rates; but it can destroy profitable investment opportunities by giving the prospective investors a risk-free yield above the internal rate of return on the investment in question.
So an interest rate based stability policy will tend to underperform a fiscal stability policy, all other things being equal. (Historically, all other things were not equal, because fiscal policy is traditionally decided once a year, while interest rate policy is decided continuously, giving interest rate policy an advantage in responsiveness. But that is an institutional idiosyncrasy, not an operational necessity.)
Then as a rule, the bond rate should be slightly below the CB rate
It's almost always above the CB rate. Often quite some way.
(if it is over banks can borrow from CB and to government, which is just another bank subsidy,
Yes. That is one of the reasons I call it a subsidy.
if it is far below you get a wide span where the profitability of investment does not depend on CB rate), and the amount that the government borrows should be irrelevant.
The Treasury yield can't go materially below the rediscount rate (unless the T-bond market is so thin that it becomes difficult to distinguish its existence at all).
If the Treasury rate is materially below the rediscount rate, banks will either dump Treasury bonds and pay back their debts to the CB with the proceeds, or (what comes to the same thing) offer non-bank holders deposit accounts with the same term structure but an interest rate somewhere between the T-bond rate and the rediscount rate.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
Yeah, then I see no other reason then subsidy for governments to borrow from anybody then their own central bank. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
Could feed the world for a hundred years for the amount of money traded in the various markets in one day. She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
"Hoarding" is an elastic term, and perhaps not the best way to put it. In my view, current government policy across the First World privileges debt over equity, the FIRE economy over the Real World© Economy and has done so for decades. And, across the First World, we can see where this leads: micro- and meso-economic insanity.
There's no way a firm actually making actual goods and/or services can approach the Return on Investment routinely made in the FIRE sector. Financial firms, using the privileging of debt, can leverage their equity capital by hundreds of percent so they are, literally, making over 100% ROI per annum. They can do that by "hoarding" - playing the futures, options, CMO, CDO, & so on markets - rather than investing in the less profitable business loan and business development. She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
Despite a hundred years of Neo-Classical propaganda, inflation is not necessarily and always a Bad Thing.
(I know I'm not telling you anything you didn't already know. I'm merely using your comment for my own nefarious purposes. :-) She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
And of course, if you create money and employ otherwise unemployed people that produce something of value, then the pool of goods and services that the money pool is related to also grows.
And also of course, the main source of inflation today appears to be from banks borrowing to private speculation. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 3 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 2 2 comments
by gmoke - Nov 28
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 21 10 comments
by gmoke - Nov 12 6 comments
by Oui - Dec 5
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 32 comments
by Oui - Dec 25 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 22 comments
by Oui - Dec 26 comments
by Oui - Dec 111 comments
by Oui - Dec 14 comments
by Oui - Nov 305 comments
by Oui - Nov 289 comments
by Oui - Nov 276 comments
by gmoke - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 268 comments
by Oui - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 2513 comments
by Oui - Nov 2318 comments
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 222 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 2110 comments
by Oui - Nov 2120 comments