The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Lotsa homeowners will see their equity go bye-bye. But that shouldn't be too much of a problem, as long as incomes remain sufficient to cover amortisations. Would suck to have been a first time buyer over the last couple of years, though.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
As long as all margins are above 20 %, and the housing stock is "only" 20 % overvalued
20% was a year ago, unfortunately I have no more recent numbers. There has been ads about getting your house value now etc (Increase mortgage, go on a trip!). How many households that are on the margin is hard to know, my suspicion is more then a downturn will cause problems with amortisations. And with the systematic insolvency in the banking sector a small slump might reveal more holes then there should be.
JakeS:
the sovereign's macroeconomic stabilisation policies are sufficiently inadequate to push the country into a business recession
Hm, we do have pro-cyclical pensions and a surplus goal in public finances, though the latter is (or at least should be) measured over a business cycle, not a year. The automatic stabilisers has been weakened - only 35% of unemployed currently collects unemployment benefits - but from a high level.
Would suck to have been a first time buyer over the last couple of years, though.
That is what I have been telling friends for at least a year now, not that they listen. Call me Cassandra. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
Call me Cassandra.
Consider buying a small apartment for 100.000 euros, all cash. Then the market falls by 20 %, and you sell your apartment for 80.000 and buy a bigger apartment, which used to cost 200.000 but now goes for 160.000. This means you'll have to borrow 80.000 and end up with a 50 % solidity, which is perfectly fine.
Now, imagine there would be no crash. Then you'd have to borrow 100.000 euros instead of 80.000 to get that bigger apartment when you sell your old apartment.
Furthermore, as long as you are debt free in your old small apartment and are not looking at moving to a bigger place, the market value does not matter a fig to you. It's your home, and it'll produce that service just as well no matter if the market booms or goes bust. The only way you lose is if you move to a smaller place, but given that you are a first time buyer who already lives in a small place, why would you? Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
In practice, most people will have to take a 15, 20 or 25 years mortgage and if they have to sell at 20% less than you bought, they'll discover the joys of negative equity.
Then again, if you have several hundred grands available, you might imagine a better use for your money than overpriced real estate.
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 1 6 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 3 11 comments
by Oui - Sep 6 2 comments
by gmoke - Aug 25 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 21 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 22 55 comments
by Oui - Aug 18 8 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Aug 12 25 comments
by Oui - Sep 7
by Oui - Sep 62 comments
by Oui - Sep 52 comments
by gmoke - Sep 5
by Oui - Sep 41 comment
by Oui - Sep 47 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 311 comments
by Oui - Sep 211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 16 comments
by Oui - Sep 114 comments
by Oui - Sep 171 comments
by Oui - Sep 11 comment
by gmoke - Aug 29
by Oui - Aug 2818 comments
by Oui - Aug 271 comment
by Oui - Aug 262 comments
by Oui - Aug 2626 comments
by Oui - Aug 251 comment
by Oui - Aug 254 comments