The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Judith Miller (born January 2, 1948) is a Pulitzer Prize-winning American journalist, formerly of the New York Times in Washington D.C. Her coverage of Iraq's alleged Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) program both before and after the 2003 invasion garnered much controversy.[1] A number of stories she wrote while working for the New York Times later turned out to be inaccurate or completely false. Miller was later involved in disclosing Valerie Plame's identity as a CIA agent. She spent three months in jail for claiming reporter's privilege and refusing to reveal her sources in the CIA leak. Miller retired from her job at the New York Times in November 2005. Later she was a contributor to the Fox News Channel and a fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute think-tank. On December 29, 2010, numerous media outlets reported that she had signed on as a contributing writer to the conservative magazine Newsmax. [2][3]
Miller was later involved in disclosing Valerie Plame's identity as a CIA agent. She spent three months in jail for claiming reporter's privilege and refusing to reveal her sources in the CIA leak. Miller retired from her job at the New York Times in November 2005. Later she was a contributor to the Fox News Channel and a fellow at the conservative Manhattan Institute think-tank. On December 29, 2010, numerous media outlets reported that she had signed on as a contributing writer to the conservative magazine Newsmax. [2][3]
I believe Bradblog may also have commented in passing on a few other minor terminological inexactitudes at the NYT over the years.
But clearly you'd rather believe any old nonsense from the NYT - with its proven track record of dishonesty - than someone with this bio:
As'ad AbuKhalil, born March 16, 1960. From Tyre, Lebanon, grew up in Beirut. Received his BA and MA from American University of Beirut in pol sc. Came to US in 1983 and received his PhD in comparative government from Georgetown University. Taught at Tufts University, Georgetown University, George Washington University, Colorado College, and Randolph-Macon Woman's College. Served as a Scholar-in-Residence at Middle East Institute in Washington DC. He served as free-lance Middle East consultant for NBC News and ABC News, an experience that only served to increase his disdain for maintream US media. He is now professor of political science at California State University, Stanislaus and visiting professor at UC, Berkeley.
Now - how on Earth could an individual with that background possibly offer an informed opinion about the Middle East?
any old nonsense from the NYT
So you consider that in this instance (whatever its record, and we surely agree on that) the NYT is talking "any old nonsense"? Care to back that up with particulars?
As for the Angry Arab's credentials, sure. Does that make him an indisputable authority in every case?
As always, reports or opinions we are looking at should be judged on their merits. What we know of the source and how seriously we take it obviously enters into that judgement. But blanket dismissal or blanket approval shouldn't.
There's no evidence yet that it is nonsense, or reason to suppose that a report on the successful overthrow of a long-time ally of the US gov is significantly mistaken. As to Angry Arab I don't care about his credentials so much as what he says and as I've pointed out several times already he gets basic things wrong in commenting on the NYT article. Maybe it's because I'm a Londoner - that I moved to Nice.
also, saying he can't read can be construed as a really racist statement.
that is also a subjective opinion, and hardly worthy of debate.
so, a few people seem to know his name. that hardly proves anything.
And the NY Times with its neo-con agenda and dubious think tanks seem to have more validity here than left wing angry academics.
You didn't quote any original Arabic sources.
And does this mean you're saying that Sharp has no links whatsoever to organisations like the ICNC? Or that you're saying the VA reports are simply lies?
Because if so, that's a hell of a stretch given the evidence trail - especially the ICNC link.
You know, it's not actually all that difficult to check Ackerman's history and connections.
I'll take the point about Einstein, but it still seems hi-falutin for someone who claims to be modest.
I'm not much bothered about Zunes' letter of support, because I'd rather look at the facts - and the facts really aren't as simple as you're claiming at all.
but it got poohpoohed because some people here don't like him.
this doesn't seem to be a very rational method of evaluating the Truth.
it must be a new low in the history of this site.
This must be a new low in your short history with this site.
Get off your high horse already. Keynesianism is intellectually hard, as evidenced by the inability of many trained economists to get it - Paul Krugman
Also, this.
AbuKhalil loves Cal State Stanislaus and its students and would not consider trading it -- even for the more highly regarded UC Berkeley, where he is a visiting professor each spring. "You know how shallow some Lebanese are about designer names, designer shoes, designer human beings, designer universities, excessive elegance?" he asked. "When I first came to Stanislaus, my mother was like, 'When are you going to leave? When are you going to leave?' She is a very well-educated person, very Francophile and very status obsessed. I had to tell her, 'You know, if you really want my happiness, you have to end this conversation. You have to accept that your son is happy at a non-prestigious university.' "
"You know how shallow some Lebanese are about designer names, designer shoes, designer human beings, designer universities, excessive elegance?" he asked. "When I first came to Stanislaus, my mother was like, 'When are you going to leave? When are you going to leave?' She is a very well-educated person, very Francophile and very status obsessed. I had to tell her, 'You know, if you really want my happiness, you have to end this conversation. You have to accept that your son is happy at a non-prestigious university.' "
the uncritical adulation here for the original NYT piece.
Do you really believe what you're writing? Or are you just dishonest? "People only accept change when they are faced with necessity, and only recognize necessity when a crisis is upon them." - Jean Monnet
YMMV.
Take a look at who Migeru said that to.
by Frank Schnittger - May 31
by Oui - May 30 46 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 23 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 27 3 comments
by Oui - May 13 66 comments
by Oui - Jun 91 comment
by Oui - Jun 58 comments
by Oui - Jun 256 comments
by Oui - Jun 112 comments
by Oui - May 31114 comments
by Oui - May 3046 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 273 comments
by Oui - May 2742 comments
by Oui - May 24
by Frank Schnittger - May 233 comments
by Oui - May 1366 comments
by Oui - May 928 comments
by Oui - May 450 comments
by Oui - Apr 30273 comments
by Oui - Apr 2666 comments
by Oui - Apr 8108 comments
by Oui - Mar 19145 comments