Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
I think this analysis mistakes cause and effect.

Small businesses have very little power. Their suppliers are mostly large businesses, their customers can easily go elsewhere, their financial situation is perilous compared to that of a large business. The list goes on. This is why they are the first to go out of business during a downturn. I would propose that what you are observing is that small business has an easier time thriving in a society where power is decentralised and economic policy is designed to favour the common citizen, than in a society run by, of and for incumbent insiders.

And as a tool for defending society from insider predation, small businesses and freeholders have historically proven greatly inferior to the mass organisation of labour that becomes possible within the large industrial firm.

Small firms may be desirable on other grounds, of course. As you note, it is possible to prefer small business for their tradition of craftsmanship, or similar aesthetics. I happen to disagree - I rather like the industrial aesthetic - but that is a matter of society's taste and custom, so this is an area in which reasonable people can disagree.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Thu Feb 24th, 2011 at 08:07:09 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Others have rated this comment as follows:

ceebs 4


Top Diaries

Occasional Series