The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
This may be a project that ET could work on? You can't be me, I'm taken
But I do think you would be doing a great service to European society if this is fine tuned for an audience who will know the basic terms, but may not be inspired by the vital arcane bits. So I think you have to draw them into the argument.
It reminds of Richard Feyman's need to hear an example of a theory to see whether it worked in a particular 'instance'.
And if you want to show patterns, then graphics can be more helpful than arrays.
I don't think you can avoid a certain element of the arcane, (It's a tricky subject) but it would help if you had sub-heads to guide the reader through the argument. You can't be me, I'm taken
I'll break up into subheadings. So, in what may be my last act of "advising", I'll advise you to cut the jargon. -- My old PhD advisor, to me, 26/2/11
What people (generally, democratically) need is an alternative ABC of finance. It affects all of us, few understand. I think it's worth doing. But it would be a different effort if you are trying to influence the ECB. You can't be me, I'm taken
Being blunt, I have to admit this is as much as I can "dumb it down" so if it has to be taken further it can't be me to do it. Not to compare myself with Feynman, but his "Lectures" aren't exactly easy reading nor apparently an effective textbook. So, in what may be my last act of "advising", I'll advise you to cut the jargon. -- My old PhD advisor, to me, 26/2/11
Defining entities and players Defining relationships Defining a simple human-readable take-away conclusion for people who can't follow the rest
The problem with the original was that it was impossible to follow unless you already knew what EONIA was, why it matters, and to whom. And there was no take-away.
Someone like Munchau would know the background. Most people wouldn't.
I think this version does a very readable job of explaining the background.
My only thought about the take-away is that it would be interesting to see if something similar is happening in the US.
If it is, you have the basis of a very viable news story, and I'd consider pitching it to the FT.
Basically the conclusion, the takeaway, needs to be foreshadowed.
The reason why financial crime has proliferated and now skews the economies of the W*stern world, is that most, even intelligent, people (including journalists, although intelligent journalist may be an oxymoron) accept the obfuscation of the Lords of Profit that finance is very very complicated, and that only the elite understands it, and for managing this 'complexity', they deserve all the treasure they amass. Bullshit. You can't be me, I'm taken
Apparantly last week's piece was not (to most). Is this an improvement? So, in what may be my last act of "advising", I'll advise you to cut the jargon. -- My old PhD advisor, to me, 26/2/11
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 11 11 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 8 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 6 4 comments
by gmoke - Mar 7
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 2 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 5 2 comments
by gmoke - Feb 25
by Oui - Mar 241 comment
by Oui - Mar 23
by Oui - Mar 231 comment
by Oui - Mar 21
by Oui - Mar 191 comment
by Oui - Mar 19
by Oui - Mar 18
by Oui - Mar 175 comments
by Oui - Mar 16
by Oui - Mar 164 comments
by Oui - Mar 1510 comments
by Oui - Mar 155 comments
by Oui - Mar 147 comments
by Oui - Mar 1312 comments
by Oui - Mar 12
by Oui - Mar 1113 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 1111 comments
by Oui - Mar 1116 comments
by Oui - Mar 109 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 104 comments