The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
In my experience it is best to start by questioning yourself:
Suppose you get viciously attacked. What space do you have to answer? Will you be vilified without getting your point across? Then you might want to play it safe, and dot the i's. Or will you be able to send a representative every time that can hammer in your one sentence? Then you might want to leave lots of room for attacks, as long as your answer every time is your one sentence.
Now you have an inkling of what you want to say, who you want to say it to, and how you want to say it. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
What I wanted to say is that form depends on function.
Take humor. Humor is often an uncertain weapon - you are making light of the plight! - which is great if you have the resources and media space to follow up, in effect then you get spin. If you do not have the resources you will only be read through your opponent's narrative - the union fat cats are joking about the poor.
Much care should also be taken so that humor is not seen in the primary material as laughing at the audience. This can inadvertently become the case if the group making the material does not overlap with the target audience. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
by Oui - Dec 5
by gmoke - Nov 28
by Oui - Dec 612 comments
by Oui - Dec 6
by Oui - Dec 41 comment
by Oui - Dec 2
by Oui - Dec 142 comments
by Oui - Dec 16 comments
by gmoke - Nov 303 comments
by Oui - Nov 3012 comments
by Oui - Nov 2838 comments
by Oui - Nov 2713 comments
by Oui - Nov 2511 comments
by Oui - Nov 24
by Oui - Nov 221 comment
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 2119 comments
by Oui - Nov 1615 comments
by Oui - Nov 154 comments
by Oui - Nov 1319 comments