Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
No, need to. I am just enrage by the hypocrisy of those in power in Spain. It is got to my nerves. But it is such a beautiful afternoon and there is no oil underground here. I think I will go and pry for Zapatero to suffer some incurable disease, so he can not join Aznar in living the good life that awaits those that served well the International Crime Syndicate (how is that for a conspiracy?).
by xurxo on Tue Mar 22nd, 2011 at 12:11:07 PM EST
[ Parent ]
xurxo:
No, need to.
Why? Because the case is self-evident or because there is no case?

So, in what may be my last act of "advising", I'll advise you to cut the jargon. -- My old PhD advisor, to me, 26/2/11
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 22nd, 2011 at 12:12:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Well, in my opinion western corporate media lost all credibility in the last decade; The war on terror, the financial ponzi pyramid happened not so long ago (still on). How did corporate media covered those? What about the meme financials are the economy? How about saving financial institutions as workers rights go back a 100 years? Where where El Pais, El Mundo, ABC, Fox, The Guardian, Der Spiegel, NBC? Did they or did they not provided the cover up for such world changing events? These corporate mediums really deserve our trust...
So, in this thread I see almost only one side of the story (corporate media's, IN MY OPINION). That makes me uneasy.
The only reason I said no need to is because I realized I am wasting my time; The only thing is, if you want someone to go away patronizing him may be not the best idea.
Salud.
by xurxo on Tue Mar 22nd, 2011 at 02:39:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Is twitter corporate media?

So, in what may be my last act of "advising", I'll advise you to cut the jargon. -- My old PhD advisor, to me, 26/2/11
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 22nd, 2011 at 02:46:14 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I think twitter is a fish tank for corporations. By corporations I also mean states. Did I say only corporate media was used?
    U.S. State Department speaks to Twitter over Iran - Reuters
by xurxo on Tue Mar 22nd, 2011 at 03:18:25 PM EST
[ Parent ]
xurxo:
So, in this thread I see almost only one side of the story (corporate media's, IN MY OPINION). That makes me uneasy.
The only reason I said no need to is because I realized I am wasting my time; The only thing is, if you want someone to go away patronizing him may be not the best idea.
Which is why
I suggest that you post your analysis of the Libya situation as a diary
But if you think that's patronizing...

So, in what may be my last act of "advising", I'll advise you to cut the jargon. -- My old PhD advisor, to me, 26/2/11
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Tue Mar 22nd, 2011 at 02:48:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
What do you think of Al Jazeera? (I think that was the most quoted corporate news source in the Libya diaries on ET.)

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Mar 22nd, 2011 at 03:20:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Al Jazeera is a beacon of freedom in a country ruled by an absolute monarchy.
by xurxo on Tue Mar 22nd, 2011 at 03:53:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
It also quite obviously opposes Ghaddafi, supports the rebels and supports the NFZ. And also supported the other Arab revolutions which your conspiracy theory article claimed to be fake revolutions engineered by the USA.

Like in the case of Hezbollah, it seems you have too simple a view of interests and players.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Tue Mar 22nd, 2011 at 05:02:32 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Top Diaries

Occasional Series