The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Tokyo Electric Power Co. on Wednesday prepared to inject nitrogen into one of the reactors at the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power complex to reduce the potential risk of a hydrogen explosion, while it succeeded in stopping highly radioactive water leaking into the Pacific Ocean from the plant. The nitrogen, an inert gas, is expected to be injected into the No. 1 reactor's containment vessel, a process that could take several days. Hidehiko Nishiyama, a spokesman for the government's nuclear agency, denied during a morning press conference that there is an ''immediate danger'' of explosion. In addition to the task of maintaining the relative stability of all six reactors at the nuclear complex, the utility firm known as TEPCO has also been engaged in efforts to stop highly radioactive water from leaking into the sea and cleaning up contaminated water within the plant.
Tokyo Electric Power Co. on Wednesday prepared to inject nitrogen into one of the reactors at the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power complex to reduce the potential risk of a hydrogen explosion, while it succeeded in stopping highly radioactive water leaking into the Pacific Ocean from the plant.
The nitrogen, an inert gas, is expected to be injected into the No. 1 reactor's containment vessel, a process that could take several days. Hidehiko Nishiyama, a spokesman for the government's nuclear agency, denied during a morning press conference that there is an ''immediate danger'' of explosion.
In addition to the task of maintaining the relative stability of all six reactors at the nuclear complex, the utility firm known as TEPCO has also been engaged in efforts to stop highly radioactive water from leaking into the sea and cleaning up contaminated water within the plant.
NEWS ADVISORY: Nitrogen injection not to cause significant rise in radioactive leaks (22:55)
The bulk modulus of water is 2.2 GPa.[28] The low compressibility of non-gases, and of water in particular, leads to their often being assumed as incompressible. The low compressibility of water means that even in the deep oceans at 4 km depth, where pressures are 40 MPa, there is only a 1.8% decrease in volume.[28]
Water exiting the fuel channels at the top guide is about 12 to 15% saturated steam (by mass), typical core flow may be 45,000,000 kg/h (100,000,000 lb/h) with 6,500,000 kg/h (14,500,000 lb/h) steam flow. However, core-average void fraction is a significantly higher fraction (~40%).
Not to be off topic, why aren't they feeding boron into the reactors? Except for one story about a request for boron from South Korea, I am not aware of a word about it since.
Given that we know for real that reactor no. 1 has gone critical several times since the accident (radioactive chlorine, the blue glow, heat spikes, and neutron episodes) they could actually be creating more heat than they are dissipating, as well as making the site more radioactive. The Fates are kind.
The last time I saw fuel rods in a pool--which I admit was some years ago--the blue glow of Cherenkov radiation (that's the radiation due to beta particles traveling faster than the speed of light in water) extended out at least one half meter from the rods. (It was very beautiful, by the way.) The safe distance will obviously be very sensitive to your personal level of machismo. It occurred to me later that standing near the edge of that pool was not the brightest thing I have ever done in my life.
in a pool--which I admit was some years ago--the blue glow of Cherenkov radiation (that's the radiation due to beta particles traveling faster than the speed of light in water) extended out at least one half meter from the rods.
(It was very beautiful, by the way.)
The safe distance will obviously be very sensitive to your personal level of machismo.
It occurred to me later that standing near the edge of that pool was not the brightest thing I have ever done in my life.
(Low-energy means nuclear.)
They had a research reactor for producing neutrons and such, studying energy levels in excited states in atomic nuclei, both stable and unstable.
If I understood correctly, this was background to test models targeted at the Island of Stability--heavier elements that might exist or that might be created, beyond the existing elements and beyond the gap of impossible elements.
They were pretty hands-on: Technicians ran the reactor, but they set up their own equipment (lead bricks, detectors, computer cables)--which meant they were in and out of the reactor building more or less daily. The Fates are kind.
The steps recommended by the nuclear commission include injecting nitrogen, an inert gas, into the containment structures in an attempt to purge them of hydrogen and oxygen, which could combine to produce explosions. On Wednesday, the Tokyo Electric Power Company, which owns the plant, said it was preparing to take such a step and to inject nitrogen into one of the reactor containment vessels. The document also recommends that engineers continue adding boron to cooling water to help prevent the cores from restarting the nuclear reaction, a process known as criticality. Even so, the engineers who prepared the document do not believe that a resumption of criticality is an immediate likelihood, Neil Wilmshurst, vice president of the nuclear sector at the Electric Power Research Institute, said when contacted about the document. "I have seen no data to suggest that there is criticality ongoing," said Mr. Wilmshurst, who was involved in the assessment.
The document also recommends that engineers continue adding boron to cooling water to help prevent the cores from restarting the nuclear reaction, a process known as criticality.
Even so, the engineers who prepared the document do not believe that a resumption of criticality is an immediate likelihood, Neil Wilmshurst, vice president of the nuclear sector at the Electric Power Research Institute, said when contacted about the document. "I have seen no data to suggest that there is criticality ongoing," said Mr. Wilmshurst, who was involved in the assessment.
TEPCO : Press Release | Plant Status of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station (as of 8:00 pm, April 6)
-We have been injecting seawater into the reactor, but from 10:10 am on March 26th, we started injecting freshwater (with boric acid).
This is for No. 2. The NISA status reports, however, for example the latest, mention "borated water" (sic!) for No. 1 (from 12 March) and No. 3 (from 13 March). *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
By the way, in one of the earliest threads, there was some link which described the injection of nitrogen to create an oxygen-depleted atmosphere as a standard (and automatic) anti-hydrogen-explosion measure during SCRAMs in some power plant types –maybe including the Fukushima type, I don't remember well. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
One thing transpiring from the first attachment that they do fear a breach of the core, but from the outside (the meltdown would be from the inside), and that's how new hydrogen gas can get into the dry well. Another is that pressure is a problem in a different way: it drops due to the cooling of the reactor at the containment wall which also makes the steam condense. *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
Tokyo Electric Power Company says the injection is aimed at preventing hydrogen from exploding inside the containment vessel at the No. 1 reactor. The fuel rods remain nearly half exposed as the coolant water inside the reactor has not yet risen high enough.
TEPCO says the injection will continue for 6 days. The company is also considering making similar injections in the No 2 and No3 reactors.
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 3 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 2 2 comments
by gmoke - Nov 28
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 21 10 comments
by gmoke - Nov 12 6 comments
by gmoke - Nov 8
by Oui - Dec 5
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 32 comments
by Oui - Dec 25 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 22 comments
by Oui - Dec 26 comments
by Oui - Dec 111 comments
by Oui - Dec 14 comments
by Oui - Nov 305 comments
by Oui - Nov 289 comments
by Oui - Nov 276 comments
by gmoke - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 268 comments
by Oui - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 2513 comments
by Oui - Nov 2318 comments
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 222 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 2110 comments
by Oui - Nov 2120 comments