The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I'm not talking about regulation. I'm talking about stating explicit political goals and monitoring progress towards them, or away from them.
Can you give an example of a clear, explicit and objective policy goal, and a clear, explicit and objective way to measure how it is attained?
Regulation isn't the problem here. Neoclassical brain rot is.
Neoclassical brain rot unfortunately produces inappropriate (lack of) regulation. And insane constitutional amendments. If it did not, it would not be a major problem. So if and when the neoclassical brain rot is purged, we must have workable policies to replace the neoclassically-inspired garbage that's been foisted upon us.
And what happens when you not only don't get the policy you want, but you do get policies which are clearly destructive to the policy you want?
Then I organise in a political party or a civil society organisation that can exercise useful amounts of power over decisionmaking and is broadly sympathetic to the policy I want. Or, if no such civil society organisation is available, I attempt to become A Very Serious Person so I can influence policy directly. I don't hold much hope at this point on either count, but one does not need hope in order to put up an honest fight.
But I can't do that until and unless I know what policy I want. Or rather I can, but then I'll get taken for a ride.
the proper function of the Civil Service is implementation, not strategy. It's not the job of the Civil Service to decide whether a high speed rail line should be built. It's the job of the Civil Service to try to get it built as cheaply and reliably as possible once the decision to build it has been made by ministers.
On the contrary. It is precisely the civil service's job to decide whether a given rail line should be built, given the government's overall fiscal and infrastructure policy. It is the minister's job to light a fire under the civil service to get them to produce reasonably coherent policy proposals on matters that interest him. And it is the minister's job to then reject, approve or decide between the proposals presented to him. But he has neither the staff, the training nor the institutional support to conduct serious strategic planning himself.
So I'll say again: this should be considered a privilege, it should be made explicit
I don't understand the need for private banks to be placed explicitly in the government chain of command. Private banks exist at the pleasure of the central bank and financial regulator - if the latter two so desire, they can pull the plug on any and all banks' business model almost literally overnight.
Make the central bank subservient to parliament, rather than this neoclassically-inspired "independent central bank" bullshit (which is in reality simply a bit of sophistry to avoid saying "bankster-run central bank"). Give it a financial stability mandate. And a clear and explicit standing order to use its big stick to beat any misbehaving private bank firmly about the head until it mends its ways or goes tits-up.
If you still have problems with misbehaving banks after that, we can start talking about constitutional amendments.
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by Oui - Sep 24 20 comments
by gmoke - Sep 24
by Cat - Sep 19 34 comments
by IdiotSavant - Sep 15 15 comments
by Oui - Sep 20 33 comments
by IdiotSavant - Sep 16 10 comments
by gmoke - Sep 12
by gmoke - Sep 5 14 comments
by Oui - Sep 2420 comments
by gmoke - Sep 24
by Oui - Sep 2320 comments
by Oui - Sep 22
by Oui - Sep 2033 comments
by Cat - Sep 1934 comments
by gmoke - Sep 19
by Oui - Sep 183 comments
by Oui - Sep 1615 comments
by IdiotSavant - Sep 1610 comments
by Oui - Sep 1524 comments
by Oui - Sep 159 comments
by IdiotSavant - Sep 1515 comments
by Oui - Sep 1420 comments
by Oui - Sep 149 comments
by Oui - Sep 1319 comments
by gmoke - Sep 12
by Oui - Sep 916 comments
by gmoke - Sep 514 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Sep 211 comments