The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
It is, after all, impossible to maintain the TINA status quo when alternatives are publicly known. She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
Not quite the same level of evilness.
(and note how at that time it was fully expected that France would join the attack...) Wind power
which then casts further doubt on the motives of the UK meetings.
regarding the expectation of French participation in the regime change, didn't a french firm have the major contract with Saddam Hussein? "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
The papers show that Lady Symons agreed to lobby the Bush administration on BP's behalf because the oil giant feared it was being "locked out" of deals that Washington was quietly striking with US, French and Russian governments and their energy firms. .... BP was concerned that if Washington allowed TotalFinaElf's existing contact with Saddam Hussein to stand after the invasion it would make the French conglomerate the world's leading oil company. BP told the Government it was willing to take "big risks" to get a share of the Iraqi reserves, the second largest in the world.
so we know that Washington was already active, including internationally, we just can't prove when. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
The Washington Post reported on November 15, 2005 that it had obtained documents detailing how executives from major oil corporations, including Exxon-Mobil Corp., Conoco, Royal Dutch Shell Oil Corp., and the American subsidiary of British Petroleum met with Energy Task Force participants while they were developing national energy policy. Vice President Cheney was reported to have met personally with the Chief Executive Officer of BP (formerly British Petroleum) during the time of the Energy Task Force's activities. In the week prior to this article revealing oil executive involvement, the Chief Executives of Exxon-Mobil and ConocoPhillips told members of the US Senate that they had not participated as part of the Energy Task Force, while the CEO of British Petroleum stated that he did not know. Regardless of whether the executives were under oath, if these statements were knowingly and materially false and deceptive then they were illegal per the The Fraud and False Statements statute (18 U.S.C. 1001).[13] In response to questions regarding the article, Cheney spokesperson Lea Ann McBride was quoted as saying that the courts have upheld "the constitutional right of the president and vice president to obtain information in confidentiality." [14]
it helps to remember that this is all occurring from cheney's 10th day in office, and the National Energy Task Force issued its report in 2001 (May?), well before 9/11. but then (from halliburton Watch):
In July 2003, after two years of legal action through the Freedom of Information Act, Judicial Watch was finally able to obtain some documents from the task force. Those documents include maps of Iraqi and other mideast oilfields, pipelines, refineries and terminals, two charts detailing various Iraqi oil and gas projects, and a March 2001 list of "Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield Contracts."
trust is lowest in areas where the independence of scientists from corporate or political power is crucial.
I find this hopeful. It means that the broad population understands the concept of tainted science. The fact is that what we're experiencing right now is a top-down disaster. -Paul Krugman
Yeah, because the Italian referenda were not referenda on the person of Burlesqueoni. Economics is politics by other means
So 95% against nuclear, even in that context, is pretty significant. Wind power
by gmoke - Apr 22 4 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 23 3 comments
by gmoke - Apr 30
by Oui - May 12
by Oui - May 115 comments
by Oui - May 11
by Oui - May 109 comments
by Oui - May 10
by Oui - May 921 comments
by Oui - May 9
by Oui - May 81 comment
by Oui - May 73 comments
by Oui - May 7
by Oui - May 63 comments
by Oui - May 61 comment
by Oui - May 5
by Oui - May 58 comments
by Oui - May 44 comments
by Oui - May 3
by Oui - May 21 comment
by Oui - May 1