The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
You need hard currency to buy stuff other people make, unless they want to give you their stuff for free, as China wants for the US (well, not really for free, since the quid-pro-quo is that China gets the US' capital plant in return).
The neoclassicals treat all currency as being commodities. So when your currency is dropping like a rock, they advise you to destroy some of it, and not print as much of it.
The problem with that advice is that people don't buy your currency because it's shiny. People buy your currency because it lets them buy your stuff. Which means that the reason your currency is losing value is either that you have higher inflation than your trading partners or that you are unable to meet your hard currency obligations.
In the former case, trying to defend the exchange rate is stupid - it will make your companies move to other countries. Eventually you will become unable to defend your exchange rate because you've lost your industries, and then you'll have neither the strong currency nor your industries.
In the latter case, you cannot defend your currency by rationing it. If you have less hard currency than you owe, Mr. Soros and his friends can always squeeze you. Now, there are two possible reasons why you might find yourself in that sort of bind. The first is that you took leave of your senses and borrowed hard currency in order to gamble with it. Like Ireland.
The second possibility is that your economy went tits-up, and that crashed your ability to make stuff to sell to foreigners for hard currency. In that case, you want, seemingly paradoxically, to print more money, because getting your economy running again is the only chance you have of producing enough stuff to cover your hard currency obligations.
Can a currency be both hard and soft? Yes and no. In principle it can't. In practise, the way the BuBa treats the -Mark is making a pretty convincing case that it can be. In fact, the whole "independent central bank" scam is all about making your soft currency behave like hard currency. Which is stupid, of course. But makes a lot of sense if you are operating in a mental model where all currency behaves as hard currency by assumption.
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 17 27 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 17 7 comments
by IdiotSavant - Oct 14 4 comments
by IdiotSavant - Oct 15 2 comments
by IdiotSavant - Oct 14 10 comments
by Oui - Oct 15 39 comments
by Oui - Oct 14 15 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 10 71 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 177 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 1727 comments
by Oui - Oct 1539 comments
by IdiotSavant - Oct 152 comments
by Oui - Oct 1415 comments
by IdiotSavant - Oct 1410 comments
by IdiotSavant - Oct 144 comments
by Oui - Oct 1142 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 1111 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 1071 comments
by Oui - Oct 822 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 876 comments
by Oui - Oct 330 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 223 comments
by Oui - Oct 25 comments
by Oui - Oct 1
by Oui - Sep 2872 comments
by ARGeezer - Sep 2729 comments
by gmoke - Sep 26
by Oui - Sep 263 comments