Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
I think that as long as the line connects to the northern end of the Lyon eastern bypass, you get rid of all the Lyon-bound train (and the few that go to Montélimar) and the line is much less saturated. That would put off the need of building an western bypass (in rather hilly countryside, even through St Etienne) by quite some time.

Un roi sans divertissement est un homme plein de misères
by linca (antonin POINT lucas AROBASE gmail.com) on Fri Jun 3rd, 2011 at 06:45:38 PM EST
Yes, the difference between that option (the more southern red branch on the map) and a western bypass is only the future traffic to Grenoble, Savoy and Italy. The Mâcon option would separate only the Rhin-Rhône and Haut-Bugey bound traffic, but all the rest of the southeast TGV traffic would use the short section until the start of the Lyon eastern bypass.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sat Jun 4th, 2011 at 07:01:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series