Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
nb41:
it seems to punish wind and benefit Ngas using the LCOE approach

So here we have another angle of attack on the Ernst & Young estimations (even though they are favourable to wind across the board) for the UK: the assumptions and calculations of levelised cost.

There are now a series of reasons why we could/should offer an alternative estimation of the comparison wind/CCGT.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Thu Nov 1st, 2012 at 03:15:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually, I get the distinct impression that the authors wanted the UK to appear with wind more expensive at the moment.

Whether that was because having wind better all the time would look like it was not a difficult report to write, or would appear biased, or because they had any reason to avoid stating the obvious, ie that it would be a good idea to exploit the biggest wind potential in Europe, it seems odd to have all those assumptions stretched in the same direction, and just enough to get wind to be just more expensive than gas, and only for a short while anyway.

Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi

by Cyrille (cyrillev domain yahoo.fr) on Thu Nov 1st, 2012 at 04:56:11 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series