The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Two points though:
-They seem to have used a tiny multiplier. That's OK if we reckon that we'll soon be back to something approaching full employment. For te reality-based community however, I would expect a stronger one for a long, long while (this helps wind)
-For the UK, even today, yes there is a high domestic share, but gas is a world market. If UK gas is cheaper, then reducing consumption should simply increase the domestic share, not reduce UK gas production. If it's more expensive, why would the new plants use UK gas? So I don't find this bit all that convincing, it feels like applying an average value to a marginal event. Plus, increasing UK gas consumption would speed up the depletion of the resource, which should carry a cost.
So my guess would be that the real situation is actually already favourable to wind even in the UK, and will be overwhelmingly so in the near future. Earth provides enough to satisfy every man's need, but not every man's greed. Gandhi
The gas burned to produce power is effectively imported (it would otherwise be reallocated to higher-value uses, lowering imports)
But, reading the report, I can see where the Tories get their anti-wind fantasy. But they need to execute a dash for shale gas, to establish a "lasting" advantage for gas over wind, even on these numbers. Otherwise wind becomes cheaper as domestic gas production declines.
I would like to see the same calculations for nuclear! I guess structurally it's similar to wind, high capital costs etc. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
Cyrille:
increasing UK gas consumption would speed up the depletion of the resource, which should carry a cost.
I take it that's what they're demonstrating in the last two charts. However, I agree with you and eurogreen that there's probably some deceptively simple reasoning there.
Unless the construction of wind farms was actually going to crowd out other economic activity (which would require an overheated economy), it's not a fair comparison. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
by gmoke - Apr 22 5 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 23 3 comments
by gmoke - Apr 30
by Oui - May 14
by Oui - May 135 comments
by gmoke - May 13
by Oui - May 1321 comments
by Oui - May 12
by Oui - May 119 comments
by Oui - May 11
by Oui - May 109 comments
by Oui - May 10
by Oui - May 921 comments
by Oui - May 9
by Oui - May 81 comment
by Oui - May 73 comments
by Oui - May 7
by Oui - May 63 comments
by Oui - May 61 comment
by Oui - May 5
by Oui - May 58 comments
by Oui - May 44 comments
by Oui - May 3