The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
To take your argument to its logical conclusion: If 15% of the population is unemployed and has a lower propensity to vote and the 85% employed always vote in their own interests, why wouldn't he "natural" unemployment rate rise to 50% whereby the 50% employed vote more and always in their own interests? Index of Frank's Diaries
My next question is, where's the pay-off? Firstly, in terms of identifiable better outcomes for SUN voters; and secondly (and circularly) in terms of better results for the left?
I'm not being facetious : I seem to remember that the registration/voting drive for Kerry in 2004 backfired (insofar as a majority of those new voters actually voted for Bush). It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
I haven't seen data for how new registrants voted in 2004 crosstabulated for who sought to ensure they were registered. But as I understand it, the Obama ground game is targeting persuadable and unlikely but supportive voters and registering them. They are not approaching, persuading, or registering people who have no propensity to vote for them based on a variety of indicators determined empirically in advance. See here for long, verbose, and wonky details Index of Frank's Diaries
And a glimmer of hope for Congress, I guess.
It will certainly be encouraging for democracy if activists can beat PACs. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
by gmoke - Nov 30
by gmoke - Nov 24
by gmoke - Nov 7
by gmoke - Nov 11
by Oui - Dec 15
by Oui - Dec 14
by Oui - Dec 13
by Oui - Dec 12
by Oui - Dec 11
by Oui - Dec 10
by Oui - Dec 9
by Oui - Dec 8
by Oui - Dec 7
by Oui - Dec 6
by Oui - Dec 61 comment
by Oui - Dec 51 comment
by Oui - Dec 4
by Oui - Dec 3
by Oui - Dec 312 comments