The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
I've been able to train myself to completely ignore advertising in print media. I can go through a newspaper and not be able to name three of the advertisers. I simply will not watch ads on television; thanks to the DVR this is easily accomplished. If for some reason we have to to watch live tv, the commercial breaks are muted.
I wish every child had to be taught about the evils of advertising in school as a required course, at least about the same time as the kids are becoming familiar with "Tom Sawyer" and "Huckleberry Finn." 'tis strange I should be old and neither wise nor valiant. From "The Maid's Tragedy" by Beaumont & Fletcher
"The problem with kids today" is that the commercial advertising to which they are subjected from an early age interferes with parental and educational marketing.
I think children should not only be taught the evils of advertising, but all hidden persuasion. You can't be me, I'm taken
Moral of story : Critical thinking, and media analysis, need to be part of the core school curriculum, starting at age 5 or 6. Because, unfortunately, not all parents are aware of the importance of the subject. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
"People who believe in Bad Idea lack education in history/critical thinking/economics/whatever. If they were better educated, people would not believe in Bad Idea. After all, I am educated, and I do not believe in Bad Idea, so others would be just like me."
I strongly disagree with this notion. I think it overestimates what education can accomplish, and further it begs the question of what exactly is meant by education. I find these discussions tend to end up somewhere around, "well, if everyone was educated into a Philosopher King, then we wouldn't have these problems."
But in any case, I am not talking about teaching values, but about giving children tools. There is nothing ideological in teaching media analysis, any more than there is in teaching mathematics. Most people will barely use their maths learning once they leave school; they will generally have much more use for media analysis skills. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
If children are encouraged to develop critical thinking, then they are largely vaccinated against advertising.
This is a commonly held view. It's also not true.
Advertisements do not typically contain factual claims upon which critical thinking may be exercised. Advertising builds recognition of brands and association of brands with other stimuli. Given adequate exposure, no amount of critical thinking skills will protect you from developing cognitive biases as a result.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
Rational thought is a thin layer developed to serve the affective system that comes to believe it is running the show. Critical thinking and so on are tool sets built on top of that. Thin and fragile toolsets that even the best of us struggle to apply properly. They help a bit, but only if you remember to use them. Propaganda works even if you know it's propaganda.
What does inoculate you against advertising is not seeing it. We don't have a normal TV feed any more so all our TV watching is either off the Internet or (ripped to harddrive) DVDs. As a result watching TV ads is a curious experience. It's as if they're speaking a slightly foreign language or a language I once spoke but have forgotten.
Truer words never spoken. Now to work on everyone's giant egos and conceptions of self...
you are the media you consume.
Advertisements do not typically contain factual claims upon which critical thinking may be exercised.
Indeed, but they use codes and techniques which are recognisable and analysable. eurogreen:
Critical thinking, and media analysis, need to be part of the core school curriculum
Pavlovian reflexes can be overcome through higher thought. This is one thing which distinguishes humans from dogs (of course, it doesn't prevent humans from behaving like dogs on occasion). Children need to have access to the tools which enable them to choose to defend themselves against mind control, if they wish to. This goes way beyond advertising, of course. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
The first ever British advert created specially for dogs - featuring high-pitched sounds that cannot be heard by humans - is due to be broadcast on ITV1 tonight. [...] Bakers, the dog food manufacturer which commisioned the advert, hope the sounds will provoke a reaction from dogs in living rooms across the country, fooling their owners into thinking they are interested in the products on the screen.
[...]
Bakers, the dog food manufacturer which commisioned the advert, hope the sounds will provoke a reaction from dogs in living rooms across the country, fooling their owners into thinking they are interested in the products on the screen.
i think, i don't watch much TV. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
i always thought it was way cool that this society made sure to let people know that what followed on the TV was advertising. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
Seriously - what positive role in society does it play? What public good does it perform, that makes up for all of its negatives? Insofar as it funds the cultural industries, I think there are better ways to do that. Why allow it at all?
You can't take advertising out of the picture without pulling down everything around it. Removing it won't make everything better on its own, because there are so many other elements - work culture, resource exploitation, human exploitation, corporate sociopathy - acting in concert with it.
The best you can hope for is an attempt to claim some media space of your own for alternative values and goals. 'Buy media' would certainly help, but it would help more to have a clear social goal which isn't just about Jobs™ or any of the other standard cliches.
That said, I think advertising is among the most obviously toxic and least redeemable of the various aspects you've described. Not all of capitalism is 100% bad. I think it beats feudal rent extraction quite handily. At some level, work does need to get done, and stuff does need to get made. At no level I can imagine do people need to be surrounded by a blanket of lies.
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 11 11 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 8 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 6 4 comments
by gmoke - Mar 7
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 2 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 5 2 comments
by gmoke - Feb 25
by Oui - Mar 21
by Oui - Mar 191 comment
by Oui - Mar 19
by Oui - Mar 18
by Oui - Mar 175 comments
by Oui - Mar 16
by Oui - Mar 164 comments
by Oui - Mar 1510 comments
by Oui - Mar 155 comments
by Oui - Mar 147 comments
by Oui - Mar 1312 comments
by Oui - Mar 12
by Oui - Mar 1113 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 1111 comments
by Oui - Mar 1116 comments
by Oui - Mar 109 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 104 comments
by Oui - Mar 94 comments
by Oui - Mar 82 comments