The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Among professionals that is indeed the legal principle. And the other european governments are as professional or non-professional as the the german one.
>In point of fact, they did not understand what they were signing. This is a matter of public record. Nowhere in the Eurozone was there any substantive public debate on the consequences of accession.<
But this nowhere in the eurozone includes Germany doesn't it?
>Suppose, now, that Germany was, in fact, acting in good faith. What is the good-faith response to realising that you have proposed a system that manifestly does not work?
It is to say "oops, sorry, let's fix this." In this case, to support unconditional fiscal defence of full employment, backed by the full seigniorage power of the central bank.<
Hold on. is there a single, I repeat a single european government proposing that? You see the problem?
>No. To be "considerable," it has to bear some considerable relationship to the magnitude of the problem. Defining "considerable" as "considerable relative to what the Swabian Housewife Economists at the Bundesbank would have liked," by contrast, is moving the goalposts.<
That is not what I said. Considerable compared to all other G8 countries, including the US and considerable measured in gdp.
>I am noting that under current treaty arrangements they have no power to overrule an obstructionist German position.<
Of course they can. Theres is no German veto not shared with any other Eu country. In every majority voting case, there is a possibility to out-vote Germany. And at the ECB, the center of your complaints, is is really easy to outvote two german members on the council.
>The US Fed/Treasury are doing an almost reasonable job of fighting their recession.<
Nonsense. The stimulus was much to small. But even you can't refashion republicans or moderate democrats into german agents, so you rather paint a rosy picture.
>I am not postulating a German conspiracy. I am noting that Germany has been peddling toxic economic Lysenkoism to the rest of Europe for four solid decades now.<
In other words, you are postulating a conspiracy. And I thought blaming les anglo saxons is simple minded.
>The fact that the Swabian Housewife Economists believe in the bullshit they peddle is not an excuse, any more than being a fervent believer in homeopathy is an excuse for pretending that it can cure disease. Nor is the fact that the rest of Europe believes it as well.<
But a fact; a fact you tend to ignore in preferment to your nationalistic narrative.
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 14 11 comments
by Oui - Jan 13 28 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 8 70 comments
by Oui - Jan 14 6 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 6 68 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 7 10 comments
by Oui - Jan 11 77 comments
by Oui - Jan 10 43 comments
by IdiotSavant - Jan 153 comments
by Oui - Jan 146 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 1411 comments
by Oui - Jan 1328 comments
by Oui - Jan 1177 comments
by Oui - Jan 1043 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 870 comments
by Oui - Jan 770 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 710 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 668 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 611 comments
by Oui - Jan 659 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 228 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 3148 comments
by Oui - Dec 3122 comments
by Oui - Dec 2834 comments
by gmoke - Dec 28
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 2718 comments
by Bernard - Dec 2451 comments
by gmoke - Dec 24