The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The opinion of some dude who hasn't done his own due diligence on the credit risk of a security is just his opinion. The opinion of a million dudes who haven't done their own due diligence on the credit risk of a security is also just their opinion. Putting their opinions together and calling it a "market" does not make it any more than the opinion of some dudes who haven't done their own due diligence.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
Because, unlike market (price) risk, which is anonymous, credit risk is associated to a particular counterparty. There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
In some jurisdictions you can take it off balance sheet, but that doesn't make it go away.
Or you can sell it, but then the buyer is exposed to the full credit risk as if they had originated the loan. There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
But you can actually outsource the credit risk to someone else. Thah's just what the big Wall Street banks did when they sliced and diced all those toxic mortages, repackaged and sold them on to Düsseldorf and all the others.
shit happens
The preferred term, used by all the Serious People©, is "Black Swan Event." She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre
If that renders the effective interest incompatible with the customer's business plan, then you can not make the loan. If the loan represents a large fraction of your equity, then you can not make the loan.
This is why you need to do it before making the loan.
But this is tangential to CDOs, where you can sell the same worthless non-coverage to multiple buyers over and over, with the certainty that if any of them try to claim on their 'coverage' you can shrug and say it's not your problem.
Oh - and the government will probably bail them out anyway.
The salient point here is that you only get to do that with idiosyncratic risk, because systemic risk is, by its nature, not independent. This is why properly run industrial societies use government back-stops to ensure that not everyone is unemployed and broke at the same time. Because the government, as the only entity which is definitionally solvent, is the only entity which can serve as a backstop against systemic risk.
Precisely! The problem with credit is that the risks are all "in the wrong direction". You get a small income stream at a rpofit in exchange for the risk of a large loss. And risk-aversion magnifies the perception of losses.
Also, diversification doesn't quite work. If you have 20 bonds with a default probability of 5% you're virtually guaranteed a loss of 5% no matter what so it's all pain, no gain. You're maybe better off gambling on just one bond where at least you have a sizeable probability of making a profit.
Naked CDS are much "better" - you pay a small fee in exchange for the chance of a big payout. There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
Where this breaks down is when everybody goes broke at the same time, because some right-wing idiot (but I repeat myself) was allowed to play with levers of government that he has neither the understanding nor the inclination to handle safely.
It means you're virtually guaranteed no upside and all downside. Logarithmic utility can be really nasty on the downside. There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
You need to look at the discounted value of the expected cash flow rather than the nominal principal, for the same reason you need to look at MWh produced rather than nameplate capacity when evaluating the required price of volatile energy sources.
Um.
If you hand the keys to the sovereign over to right-wingers, then of course they break it. But that is not dependent on the particulars of finance theory - right-wingers break your economy because breaking countries for fun and profit is what right-wingers do.
Due diligence cannot protect you from shit happens.
Part of doing your due diligence is to make sure that the contract you are entering into will not cause your firm to cease to exist if shit happens. Unless said shit is so bad that your firm has a meaningful risk of ceasing to exist anyway. Part of doing your due diligence is to ask "what could possibly go wrong?" come up with a reasonably comprehensive answer, and then make contingency plans for all of those situations. Even if the contingency plan is just "in case of nuclear war, roll over and die."
...it's not a loan. It's a liquidity operation. There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
Banks know that and they keep on doing it, even as it goes out of fashion. Wind power
If I pawn a clock or a house, the lender does not have a credit risk, but a risk that their evaluation of the value of the collateral will not be correct when if a time comes when the collateral needs to be sold. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
Then again, some people say "all risk is liquidity risk". There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
Liquidity risk is a political problem of whether you get to defer payment. Credit risk is a fundamental problem of whether you are able to make payment.
You need one to make a hotel or plane reservation, or to rent a car, even if you plan to pay cash. Many stores require a credit card to accept your check. Responsible use of a credit card builds a good credit rating, too, marking the owner as mortgage-worthy. But people who have never had credit or need to repair a poor credit history may not qualify for a regular credit card.
But people who have never had credit or need to repair a poor credit history may not qualify for a regular credit card.
Sweden instead uses implicit credit worthyness unless the central government register says that we failed to pay a bill so many times that it ended up with Kronofogden. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
The advantage of this system is that you can (could, until a few years ago) write a cheque for just about anything. The banks are trying hard to stamp out the massive use of cheques (because they cost them money) and force us to use credit (or debit) cards.
Credit card balances are paid off automatically every month from your bank account, so you can't have outstanding balance on your card (what you have instead is an overdraft). It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 3 2 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 2 2 comments
by gmoke - Nov 28
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 21 10 comments
by gmoke - Nov 12 6 comments
by gmoke - Nov 8
by Oui - Dec 5
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 32 comments
by Oui - Dec 25 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Dec 22 comments
by Oui - Dec 26 comments
by Oui - Dec 111 comments
by Oui - Dec 14 comments
by Oui - Nov 305 comments
by Oui - Nov 289 comments
by Oui - Nov 276 comments
by gmoke - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 268 comments
by Oui - Nov 26
by Oui - Nov 2513 comments
by Oui - Nov 2318 comments
by Oui - Nov 22
by Oui - Nov 222 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 2110 comments
by Oui - Nov 2120 comments