Is the Crystal Ball Clearing? | 148 comments (147 topical, 1 editorial, 0 hidden)

Re: That, yes... (none / 1)

But as long a you have the capital to issue a lot of independent 5 % non-payment risk loans, you can get away with simply discounting it 5 %.

The salient point here is that you only get to do that with idiosyncratic risk, because systemic risk is, by its nature, not independent. This is why properly run industrial societies use government back-stops to ensure that not everyone is unemployed and broke at the same time. Because the government, as the only entity which is definitionally solvent, is the only entity which can serve as a backstop against systemic risk.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Mar 13th, 2012 at 10:17:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That, yes... (none / 0)

I think the key thing we should have learned from LTCM is that it's difficult to determine which risks are independent, which are not, and what sort of feedback the dependent ones will create for one another.

by rifek on Tue Mar 13th, 2012 at 03:00:20 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That, yes... (none / 1)

No, the key take-home points from the Long Term Capital Management fiasco are:

The market can remain irrational longer than you can remain solvent.
Don't bet your entire business that you're the smartest guy on the block.
Don't bet your entire business on any single transaction, particularly when that transaction does not keep the two first bullets firmly in mind.

Of course, none of this should have been in any way novel or surprising, and the fact that humanity regularly has to re-learn such simple matters of common prudence does not auger well for our collective cognitive prowess.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Mar 13th, 2012 at 03:18:59 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That, yes... (none / 1)

We knew those before. LTCM thought that, if some risk spreading is good, more is better, but they never took into account that if you spread risk far enough, it becomes recursive.

by rifek on Wed Mar 14th, 2012 at 02:41:54 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: That, yes... (none / 0)

They drank their own cool-aid.

"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."

by ARGeezer (ARGeezer a in a circle eurotrib daught com) on Wed Mar 14th, 2012 at 04:34:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Is the Crystal Ball Clearing? | 148 comments (147 topical, 1 editorial, 0 hidden)

Top Diaries

It's still no deal

The Primacy of EU Law and its implications

After Brexit, Europe at a Crossroad

The UK can unilaterally revoke its A.50 notification

Back-stabbing the back stop

Can the UK reverse the Brexit process?

GHW Bush Passed Away

Sharia: No Escape From Dubai - Authoritarian Sheikh

Recent Diaries

The Primacy of EU Law and its implications

After Brexit, Europe at a Crossroad

It's still no deal

Rise of Populism Based on Terror and Islamophobia

Sharia: No Escape From Dubai - Authoritarian Sheikh

The UK can unilaterally revoke its A.50 notification

Back-stabbing the back stop

GHW Bush Passed Away

Green New Deal, Extinction Rebellion Demands, & My...

Can the UK reverse the Brexit process?

Comedian frontrunner in Ukrainian presidential election

Brexit Leadership

Poroshenko Doing a 'Gulf of Tonkin' Provocation

This is what BREXIT IS BREXIT means

Dutch Gov't Hard Facts and Lies/Propaganda about Syria

Xenophobia, Israel, Alt-right and the Jewish Question

Is the UK about to have a radical Brexiteer regime?

CIA REPORT: MBS ORDERED KHASHOGGI MURDER

PM Theresa May: Stirred not Shaken

Deal done?

Occasional Series