The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The resource on land is strong enough, but will involve wholesale changes to the way projects are sited and permitted. But Japan is already making a huge effort to go offshore, though stupidly.
They want to overtake Norway as the leader in floating wind, especially since they don't have any shallow waters like the North Sea. This will eventually become a very strong global technology, but one that will take some time to evolve to maturity, if not longer.
So they should accent onshore, but... (yuk, technology in nature).
1 Gigawatt floating offshore is the near term goal. Good for some of the firms working on the technology, but why not develop an industry where the risks are small and known? Rioght. "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
Are suitable areas not more limited due to the high population density, though?
They want to overtake Norway as the leader in floating wind
Would present-day state-of-the-art off-shore turbines withstand hurricane-force winds? *Lunatic*, n. One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by gmoke - Jun 6
by gmoke - May 16 1 comment
by Oui - Jun 13
by Oui - Jun 12
by Oui - Jun 11
by Oui - Jun 10
by Oui - Jun 101 comment
by Oui - Jun 99 comments
by Oui - Jun 93 comments
by Oui - Jun 86 comments
by Oui - Jun 717 comments
by Oui - Jun 62 comments
by Oui - Jun 58 comments
by Oui - Jun 421 comments
by Oui - Jun 3
by Oui - Jun 21 comment
by Oui - Jun 117 comments
by Oui - Jun 11 comment
by Oui - May 304 comments