The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
But in my first post I was trying to make the point (about Europe standing together) why solidarity is good for the core as well as the periphery.
Sadly, I don't think anyone from the core countries would believe it.
And that's why Europe is a dead man walking.
Finally though, I'd make the plea that we don't forget that at some level this current crisis is artificial. There are structural problems and they are what we've been talking about (fiscal transfer, solidarity, etc.) but the crisis of the moment is pretty simply the failure of the ECB to act as the lender of last resort. As such the markets are attacking countries one by one, simply because they can...
Instead, what's being proposed is that structural funds be used to pay down debt to the core countries. That's the extent of solidarity in Europe. There are three stories about the euro crisis: the Republican story, the German story, and the truth. -- Paul Krugman
Very hard to resolve that one - especially given the neuroscience of recent years about facts, changing opinions etc.
Although of course, one might question if there's a bias there as well, isn't it to the advantage of conservatives to suggest that it's hard to get people to progress? Doesn't that elevate their attitude to "state of nature"?
We keep running circles around the elephant in the room, which is that the EU needs to fund accumulation of productive capital in the periphery in ways that imply net fiscal transfer from the core, or "surplus recycling", or "repatriation of surplus".
You can give a man a fishing pole, but unless you teach him how to fish..... ?
BTW, isn't what you are suggesting basically an enhanced version of structural and cohesion funds?
The problem that I see is that there is an underlying issue of ability to compete that is going to require either massive emigration from the periphery, or the development of a domestic ability to compete in those countries. The dilemma is not entirely unlike what happened as the US market was integrated in the 20th century. The South couldn't compete, so there was massive emigration to the North. Finally, the development of a strong federal government allowed the redistribution of wealth from the North to the South.
But that sort of redistribution required a strong federal government, which the EU does not currently have.........
Let's be honest, the development of that sort of capacity in Europe was basically mean the end of the sovereignty of the nation-state in Europe.
Do we really believe that the Czechs and other euroskeptics will allow that? And I'll give my consent to any government that does not deny a man a living wage-Billy Bragg
The only viable options are to dismantle the monetary union or create the federal institutions necessary to perform those tasks. If the latter is politically unpalatable, the former will happen - voluntarily or messily, but it will happen. Because there are quite good reasons for sovereigns to exist, and those reasons don't go away just because you legislate neoliberal fantasies that assume away all the reasons for sovereigns to exist.
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
Monetary union means the loss of sovereignty, because the state is no longer definitionally solvent and can thus not engage in a number of tasks conventionally considered a requirement for sovereignty (such as domestic macroeconomic planning).
deposit insurance for banks granting limited liability to businesses disaster relief access to health care access to education access to legal redress public safety
by Frank Schnittger - May 27 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 5 22 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 23 1 comment
by Oui - May 13 65 comments
by Carrie - Apr 30 7 comments
by Oui - May 30
by Frank Schnittger - May 273 comments
by Oui - May 2712 comments
by Oui - May 24
by Frank Schnittger - May 231 comment
by Oui - May 1365 comments
by Oui - May 910 comments
by Frank Schnittger - May 522 comments
by Oui - May 449 comments
by Oui - May 312 comments
by Oui - May 29 comments
by gmoke - May 1
by Oui - Apr 30269 comments
by Carrie - Apr 307 comments
by Oui - Apr 2644 comments
by Oui - Apr 886 comments
by Oui - Mar 19143 comments