The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
If it is just me it would not be necessary. But we are talking about quite a few millions of people...
And let me tell what I object about your view and your so called "progressive" group of people who are minority in practically all societies. I object your offensive, narcissistic obsession with telling everyone what to think and feel
I'm telling you that mere feelings are not valid arguments for prosecuting people.
People are different and in this time in many places free to think and feel what they want (or it seems to be the case to degree). So live with it.
I object to you wanting to use the courts to force me to agree with you.
As they say "live and let others live".
Seems like the Russian courts did not get that memo.
You as atheists are protected enough
I guess that "separate but equal" is OK in your mind.
and just live with a fact that others can have protection too,
Respect and tolerance...that's what we need.
Respect, as I've said before, is something you earn. And the Russian Orthodox Church hasn't earned any.
I can't see how they can make any advance for your ideology...unless it is because you like porn...
Liking porn has nothing to do with it (not that there is anything wrong with liking porn, though I don't think I'd share Pussy Riot's tastes in that genre).
- Jake Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
Any nonviolent action
PR violated Church's property and rules for their goals so how is this not violent. Do they need to kill someone?
Oh I am getting tired and I start to sound to my self as an echo. It is enough for now unless we have something new to say on this...Obviously there is no way for us to come to any conclusion here. Not even that we "agree on disagreeing"... Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind...Albert Einstein
There is nothing wrong in you/or PR hating Russian Orthodox Church.And you can attack it at wish using lawful tactics.
Don't give me vague generalities about intent and insincerity. Concrete, actionable actions only.
Oh, and you never did give a clear and unambiguous answer to the question of whether it should be criminal to upload a YouTube video with a song you don't like set to background footage of a church. Should it?
PR violated Church's property and rules for their goals so how is this not violent.
Do they need to kill someone?
Disrespecting the subsidized property privileges of the church... not so much.
Not even that we "agree on disagreeing"...
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 2 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 26 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 31 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 22 3 comments
by Cat - Jan 25 61 comments
by Oui - Jan 9 21 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 13 28 comments
by gmoke - Jan 20
by Oui - Feb 310 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 21 comment
by Oui - Feb 235 comments
by Oui - Feb 14 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 313 comments
by gmoke - Jan 29
by Oui - Jan 2731 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 263 comments
by Cat - Jan 2561 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 223 comments
by Oui - Jan 2110 comments
by Oui - Jan 21
by Oui - Jan 20
by Oui - Jan 1841 comments
by Oui - Jan 1591 comments
by Oui - Jan 145 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Jan 1328 comments
by Oui - Jan 1221 comments
by Oui - Jan 1120 comments