The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
So, when you hit your target in terms of renewables capacity, and your fossil plants are only producing say 25% of the electricity they are producing today, you switch the war-mode effort to pumped storage etc... having done the planning carefully in the meantime of course. It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
the balancing is provided by the fossil plants you're displacing. You don't need any new peaking gas plants, surely?
But the challenge set by asdf was an end to all coal-electricity within five years. So, I took that to mean no balancing with coal either, at least for this extreme-test scenario.
Yes, you're right that it would be cheaper to have some coal for balancing, in a 10-15 year transition. And in reality, that's what's happening: fossil plants just run with lower capacity factors, and might spend much of the year in mothballs.
by gmoke - Apr 22 5 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 23 3 comments
by gmoke - Apr 30
by gmoke - May 13
by Oui - May 13
by Oui - May 12
by Oui - May 119 comments
by Oui - May 11
by Oui - May 109 comments
by Oui - May 10
by Oui - May 921 comments
by Oui - May 9
by Oui - May 81 comment
by Oui - May 73 comments
by Oui - May 7
by Oui - May 63 comments
by Oui - May 61 comment
by Oui - May 5
by Oui - May 58 comments
by Oui - May 44 comments
by Oui - May 3
by Oui - May 21 comment