The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
This is exactly my question. If the integration timeline is, say, 20 years to get to, say, 50% of solar PV and wind supply, then that is one set of requirements to the power engineers. If the integration timeline is, say, 5 years, that is a significantly different--and potentially much more expensive--set of requirements...
More expensive? By what corrupt metrics? "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
http://www.ieawind.org/task_25.html
It seems that the stability of the grid does not become a problem at any penetration, i.e., solutions exist and are very affordable.
Another issue is that very high penetrations require improvements in transmission to reap the aggregation benefits. I.e., building long HVDC interconnects. There, concerns similar to yours may have a bit more validity. Somebody just has to start building the damn things ;-)
by gmoke - May 16
by gmoke - Apr 22 5 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 23 3 comments
by gmoke - Apr 30
by Oui - May 20
by Oui - May 19
by Oui - May 1817 comments
by Oui - May 18
by Oui - May 1717 comments
by Oui - May 15
by Oui - May 1512 comments
by Oui - May 14
by Oui - May 136 comments
by gmoke - May 13
by Oui - May 1321 comments
by Oui - May 12
by Oui - May 119 comments
by Oui - May 111 comment
by Oui - May 109 comments
by Oui - May 10
by Oui - May 921 comments
by Oui - May 9