The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
A short pdf on one of the programs being run by the CLEEN consortium (companies, academia, research institutions, cooperating using Finnish state funding channeled through Tekes - the Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation). You can't be me, I'm taken
Short term stability of the gird does not compute with high penetration of wind. The short term stability of the grid is fine, especially in amurka where wind is 2%. High penetration of wind, you mean like in north germany or higher in Denmark, where we're well over 20%, and the grid still functions?
What we've learned is... utility engineers like to have something to do. In spite of them doing something, electron force still flows.
At current levels, and projected into the mid-term, there are zero effects on the grid which can't be managed cost-effectively.
What required technology? "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
Reserve capacity is something that needs to be managed on a system-wide basis, not on a plant by plant basis, otherwise it becomes horribly expensive - for all types of producers. This is the core mistake anti-wind opponents do about the cost of intermittency of wind - what matters is not the absolute intermittency of wind, but the additional cost it imposes on the system (which already has to deal with large intra-day variability and with possible incidents at very large plants like nukes). Practice tells us that this additional cost has consistently been overestimated. Wind power
"Practice tells us that this additional cost has consistently been overestimated. " "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
In large wind farms connected to the transmission network the main technical constraint to take into account is the power system transient stability that could be lost when, for example, a voltage dip causes the switch off of a large number of WGs. A system experiences a state of voltage instability when there is a progressive or uncontrollable drop in voltage magnitude after a disturbance, increase in load demand or change in operating condition. The main factor, which causes these unacceptable voltage profiles, is the inability of the distribution system to meet the demand for reactive power. Under normal operating conditions, the bus voltage magnitude (V) increases as Q injected at the same bus is increased. However, when V of any one of the system's buses decreases with the increase in Q for that same bus, the system is said to be unstable. Although the voltage instability is a localised problem, its impact on the system can be wide spread...
A system experiences a state of voltage instability when there is a progressive or uncontrollable drop in voltage magnitude after a disturbance, increase in load demand or change in operating condition. The main factor, which causes these unacceptable voltage profiles, is the inability of the distribution system to meet the demand for reactive power. Under normal operating conditions, the bus voltage magnitude (V) increases as Q injected at the same bus is increased. However, when V of any one of the system's buses decreases with the increase in Q for that same bus, the system is said to be unstable. Although the voltage instability is a localised problem, its impact on the system can be wide spread...
Voltage Stability Investigation of Grid Connected Wind Farm Trinh Trong Chuong
According to my limited understanding of the subject, to successfully integrate a large fraction of wind generators into your grid you need to have pretty sophisticated real-time monitoring of the voltage and current phases throughout the grid, and a system that tells you what to do when you have a troublesome transient condition, and then the appropriate resources (reactive power sources, for example) appropriately distributed within the system.
I don't know much about this, but my impression is that there is a lot of electrical engineering work going on in the background that is not immediately apparent. And my fundamental worry is that while "we" are all working vigorously for additional sustainable resources in the overall supply system, some of the hard technical problems have not actually been solved yet...
Maybe I'm full of it, which is why I would ask such questions at an appropriate conference...
This is exactly my question. If the integration timeline is, say, 20 years to get to, say, 50% of solar PV and wind supply, then that is one set of requirements to the power engineers. If the integration timeline is, say, 5 years, that is a significantly different--and potentially much more expensive--set of requirements...
More expensive? By what corrupt metrics? "Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage." - Anaïs Nin
http://www.ieawind.org/task_25.html
It seems that the stability of the grid does not become a problem at any penetration, i.e., solutions exist and are very affordable.
Another issue is that very high penetrations require improvements in transmission to reap the aggregation benefits. I.e., building long HVDC interconnects. There, concerns similar to yours may have a bit more validity. Somebody just has to start building the damn things ;-)
by gmoke - May 16
by gmoke - Apr 22 5 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 23 3 comments
by gmoke - Apr 30
by Oui - May 20
by Oui - May 19
by Oui - May 1817 comments
by Oui - May 18
by Oui - May 1717 comments
by Oui - May 15
by Oui - May 1512 comments
by Oui - May 14
by Oui - May 136 comments
by gmoke - May 13
by Oui - May 1321 comments
by Oui - May 12
by Oui - May 119 comments
by Oui - May 111 comment
by Oui - May 109 comments
by Oui - May 10
by Oui - May 921 comments