Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
If you are allowed to give only two numbers, the best way to characterize it is IMO the one I outlined above.

Best, for what purpose? It is certainly not fit for a complete representation. Regarding IWR, they aren't interested in the time evolution only; the context of this criticism is public perception of price levels.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Mon Oct 8th, 2012 at 06:42:20 AM EST
[ Parent ]
the context of this criticism is public perception of price levels

Then I think they are over-sensitive. Come on, there is more to life than spin :-)

by mustakissa on Mon Oct 8th, 2012 at 11:09:29 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Spin can kill real energy policy. Price levels are the focus of the energy debate in Germany at present, with conservatives and liberals and traditional Big Energy claiming renewables cause high prices and need to be curbed.

But, you still haven't answered my question regarding for what purpose you (and EEX) consider the sans-weekend average of peak power the best measure. You obviously have something in mind when you say weekday peak power is typically more expensive, but I honestly don't know what and I'd like it spelled out.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Mon Oct 8th, 2012 at 03:58:43 PM EST
[ Parent ]
On second thought, let me be more explicit. You did write this much about the speciality of workday peak power:

working-day peaks, when power companies have to throw in their most expensive, rarely used resources

However, the situation when power companies have to throw in their most expensive, rarely used resources is not average peak load, nor average weekday peak load, but peak loads higher than that. Such peaks can appear at any time in the week when caused by a baseload plant shutdown. With the spread of intermittent renewables, these peaks can appear at any time of the day or week. Hence my earlier contention that using the standard deviation would be a good measure of price extremes. With that background, I can imagine two possibilities: either I'm not aware of something special about the usefulness of the weekday measure, or that usefulness is dated (reflecting the pre-renewables, pre-deregulation structure of the power market).

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Mon Oct 8th, 2012 at 04:21:33 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Best practice would in any case be to use the full sample and then test for weekday effects. It's not that hard - we expect undergraduate economists to understand how to do it.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Tue Oct 9th, 2012 at 04:29:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Nothing special really. Just the highest peaks that are still somewhat common. But yes, it will always be a rough-and-ready measure. Like standard deviation for what is likely a highly non-normal distribution.
by mustakissa on Tue Oct 9th, 2012 at 05:59:30 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series