I was trying to be fairly balanced in presenting the arguments.  My interest was sparked because I know local campaigners who are very passionate about protecting porpoises.  I posted a diary here because I know there are people who are very passionate about promoting wind technology who can present that side far more effectively than I can.

Locally, the plans for the Atlantic Array were significantly scaled back following public consultation. That doesn't say riding roughshod to me.

My skepticism is actually towards the decision makers.  There is a sense of wanting to rush forward on approving proposals (renewables targets, job creation) before firmly establishing the evidence base or ascertaining where protected zones are necessary to protect marine life.

Some people say wind farms are great big scam but every direction you look in there are vested interests and misinformation - so for the lay person, deciding whether or not to support wind power, it isn't easy to navigate.

If anyone does have links to reports on the benefits of mitigation, I'd be interested in passing those on.

I also live alongside a massive opencast which although no longer operational still causes health issues, leaves cars and houses filthy and will sooner or later cause a death since the site owners are still trying to secure extensions to continue mining and won't restore or properly secure the site in the meantime.