The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Surely any currency only has value, to the extent that users have trust that it will be a reliable store of value.
We're forgetting one very important function of money which is to serve as a token of state power issued to mobilize resources. This has been in evidence from the time Alexander the Great flooded the Eastern Mediterranean with gold coinage in the process of bankrolling his military campaigns.
Seigniorage is a nonviolent way to commandeer resources, by using the power to issue coinage to appropriate resources in the market. I distribute. You re-distribute. He gives your hard-earned money to lazy scroungers. -- JakeS
Coinage as I understand it, apart from small denomination coins, was the minting function, whereby the sovereign's Mint would assay, stamp and issue coins from raw material for private citizens.
Sure, there was debasement, such as clipping, which benefited the sovereign, but for the most part sovereigns have tended to pledge their credit in one way or another. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
The national deficit is basically the State issuing money in excess of its revenues to mobilize resources. I distribute. You re-distribute. He gives your hard-earned money to lazy scroungers. -- JakeS
It's a canard.
Central Banks issue fiat currency as a tax credit in their capacity as fiscal agents of the Treasury and they spend this by crediting the memorandum accounts of clearing banks. The Treasury then issues dated interest-bearing Debt which is purchased by private banks.
Private banks also create - as sub fiscal agents of the Treasury - what are 'look-alike' tax credits and these are indistinguishable from central bank money. This virtual cash is then either spent - by crediting Central Bank memorandum accounts - on purchasing goods, services or assets (particularly treasury debt) or lent by entering into a sale and repurchase agreement of the cash asset.
The misunderstanding which permeates Economics is to regard the relationship between Treasury and Central Bank as a counter-party relationship when it's an agency relationship.
Likewise, central banks do not 'owe' cash reserves to private banks: private banks 'own' cash deposits.
Two different 'liabilities': the undated creditary/ownership liability of cash reserves; and the dated liabilities of loans and term deposits have been wrongly conflated. "The future is already here -- it's just not very evenly distributed" William Gibson
True, but then you have thing like the Maastricht Treaty where the relationship is regarded as adversarial...
Sort of auto-immune. I distribute. You re-distribute. He gives your hard-earned money to lazy scroungers. -- JakeS
Do you have examples of sovereigns' principal source of funding being collecting seigniorage through coinage issue?
The Spanish kings famously brought back precious metals from the colonies, what they didn't use to pay for exports from China via Manila, thence to Acapulco, etc. This factor was sufficiently important that, when Raleigh intercepted the shipment one year, the booty, it has been argued, produced a boom in England.
Likewise, the early accession of California and Nevada as states to the USA and the need and urgency of the transcontinental railroad was justified on the basis of the perceived value of the gold and silver they produced. While the Civil War was financed mostly by greenback dollars, precious metal was seen as important for assuring the value of those dollars, especially to foreign counterparties.
Today it is reported that almost all gold mined in China is kept by the government to build Chinese reserves. That said, it is highly unlikely that China would consider resumption of even a gold reference standard.
One amusing suggestion for dealing with the 'fiscal cliff' has been that Geithner use a section of the code dealing with the authorization of the Secretary of the Treasury, via the Mint, to mint coins of any value in platinum. Thereby he could mint a $1 Trillion dollar coin, drive over to the Fed, deposit it in the US Government account and then the government could write checks on that deposit as opposed to increasing the national debt. A coin a year for a few years could pay for quantitative easing for the public, which, if done along the lines Steve Keen suggests - requiring that such money be used first to pay down debt - would resolve the debt crisis. I would suggest minting $1 million dollar platinum coins to sell as status symbols for the wealthy. No lady should go out without a $1 million coin somewhere on her person.
"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
Congressman To Introduce Law To Ban The Trillion Dollar Platinum Coin Earlier today, Paul Krugman hopped on board and said Obama must be ready to mint the coin if the GOP decides to try to force the country into defaulting on its obligations. And now a US Congressman has come out against the coin idea and is proposing a law to ban it (via Matthew O'Brien). Ironically, this action actually legitimizes the coin option.
Earlier today, Paul Krugman hopped on board and said Obama must be ready to mint the coin if the GOP decides to try to force the country into defaulting on its obligations.
And now a US Congressman has come out against the coin idea and is proposing a law to ban it (via Matthew O'Brien). Ironically, this action actually legitimizes the coin option.
A new wonder of the world: a solid platinum fiat money coin! How deliciously confounding. Of course Obama could veto any legislation proposed to remove the cited authority. But why be a piker. GWB's legacy bequeathed tens of trillions of new debt for the US government. Why just mint one coin? Mint ten or twenty, enough to redeem all of the increased debt from GWB's inauguration to Obama's. Triumph over debt!
See! These problems really are easy to resolve if just seen in the proper light. "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
Its longterm use is as Medium of exchange because it can be traded more anonymously then most. Two parties can for a short term use Bitcoins in order to hide a transaction. So those interested in selling a service that potential customers wants to have hidden has a reason to provide the option of buying in bitcoins. Sweden's finest (and perhaps only) collaborative, leftist e-newspaper Synapze.se
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 8 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 6 4 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 11 9 comments
by gmoke - Mar 7
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 2 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 5 2 comments
by gmoke - Feb 25
by Frank Schnittger - Feb 16
by Oui - Mar 164 comments
by Oui - Mar 15
by Oui - Mar 147 comments
by Oui - Mar 1312 comments
by Oui - Mar 12
by Oui - Mar 1113 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 119 comments
by Oui - Mar 1116 comments
by Oui - Mar 109 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 103 comments
by Oui - Mar 94 comments
by Oui - Mar 8
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 83 comments
by Oui - Mar 71 comment
by Oui - Mar 7
by Oui - Mar 66 comments