Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Federalists table `Treaty of Bozar' | EurActiv

The federalist Spinelli Group and German think tank Bertelsmann Stiftung launched yesterday (3 October) a proposal for a reform of the Treaty of Lisbon in the form of a draft treaty called 'A Fundamental Law of the European Union'.

...A brief look at the book sows the following advances in EU integration proposed:

  • The EU is defined as a federation of member states;
  • EU countries are obliged to respect the "values of the EU";
  • The European Commission becomes the EU government, while the Council where member countries sit becomes a second chamber of Parliament. The Commission is responsible to both chambers (the European Parliament and the Council);
  • The Council and the Parliament obtain the right of limited legislative initiative;
  • The rotating presidency is abolished. The number of Commissioners is reduced, the Commission President decides the commissioners' nominations;
  • Some MEPs are elected in pan-European electoral districts, on the basis of transnational lists;
  • The Eurozone gets a separate budget;
  • A new category of "Associated member state" is created;
  • The ECB powers are enhanced. Mutualisation of debt becomes possible on the basis of strict budget discipline;
  • Unanimity for treaty change is no longer required.


*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Sat Oct 5th, 2013 at 05:48:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Sounds like the Council plus Parliament system would be roughly like the U.S.'s Senate and House. One would think that there are enough examples of that method not working that you would want to steer clear of it when constructing a new system...
by asdf on Sun Oct 6th, 2013 at 11:44:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's a lot like the German federal parliament and federal council, too...

In the Neurozone, there can be only one.
by Carrie (migeru at eurotrib dot com) on Sun Oct 6th, 2013 at 02:04:53 PM EST
[ Parent ]
well, what else have you got?

Unicameral systems are much more open to radical, ill-considered change, and hijacking by the executive.

It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II

by eurogreen on Sun Oct 6th, 2013 at 02:56:04 PM EST
[ Parent ]
I sort of think that we are perfectly able to do that within our system.

It seems to me that systems with kings and serfs seem to have the best long-term stability.

by asdf on Mon Oct 7th, 2013 at 07:10:46 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display: