The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
The ECB+EC people believe that Europe's return of growth is dependent on investor confidence, because if confidence returs investors will invest and create jobs and hence demand, even if ironically don't admit the problem at the moment is a lack of demand.
Krugman has called this the belief in the confidence fairy. If we just behave virtuosly, she will arrive, wave her magic wand and make all the economic problems go away. They also believe that the one thing which scares investors the most is when bondholders have to take haircuts (in spite of the fact that the reason bondholders get higher rates than you get for deposits at the central bank is that they carry higher risk), followed by bondholders being converted to equity, or equity holders being invited to take part in rights issues.
It is unclear why they believe these things, as they are not in any way supported by evidence. According to surveys, investors currently refuse to invest not because they lack confidence (or because taxes are too high and regulations too paralyzing), but because there is not enough demand for their products. Why build a new factory when your old one is operating at half capacity? Further, why should you worry in the least over bond vigilantes when every country with a central bank which is doing its job can borrow at the lowest rates for several centuries?
Because this is ideology. It is belief. This is a world-view which says the world works in this way, and damn the consequences and evidence. This is the why Olli Rehn tells economists to stop researching this subject, because evidence will show that the current policies are not working, which will undermine confidence and hence stop said policies from working. Pointing out that confidence is not the crucial factor will result in the same kind of answer, in this Kafkaesque world of circular arguments.
Peak oil is not an energy crisis. It is a liquid fuel crisis.
It's a bit like the Iraq war.
The analogy is striking. Untold mayhem and suffering unleashed with cascades of "unforeseeable consequences" (mostly foreseeable), because of a mistaken belief which didn't stand up to serious scrutiny : the existence of WMD.
"Growth through austerity", on the other hand, seems to be much more tenacious as a belief : it only took a few months to deflate the WMD myth, but the ECB are laying waste to one country after another, without comprehending the visible disproof of their doctrine.
It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue
- Queen Elizabeth II
by Cat - Mar 31 1 comment
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 22 3 comments
by Oui - Mar 27 23 comments
by gmoke - Mar 17
by Oui - Mar 16 22 comments
by Oui - Mar 15 5 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 9 3 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 14 14 comments
by Cat - Mar 311 comment
by Oui - Mar 31
by Oui - Mar 294 comments
by Oui - Mar 274 comments
by Oui - Mar 2723 comments
by Oui - Mar 22
by Oui - Mar 2211 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 223 comments
by Oui - Mar 1988 comments
by Oui - Mar 1744 comments
by gmoke - Mar 17
by Oui - Mar 1622 comments
by Oui - Mar 1541 comments
by Oui - Mar 155 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Mar 1414 comments
by Oui - Mar 134 comments
by Oui - Mar 128 comments
by Oui - Mar 1112 comments
by Oui - Mar 1060 comments