The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
In one of my old school books there was map showing democratic and non-democratic states in europe in 1929 and 1933. You imagine what happened: everything east of the Rhine and south of them mountains switched to dictatorship. And all right-wing dictatorship. But that doesn't means fascist. There were only two fascist states: Germany and Italy.
Now Hungary was traveling down the road to fascism in the mid-thirties and you can quibble about other countries.
But a definition that would have subsumed Germany and Latvia or Estonia as both fascist in the thirties is obviously meaningless.
So yes, fascism is an italian invention and doesn't needs to have all the defining traits of nazism.
But still the term has a meaning and shouldn't be used as term for anything someone doesn't likes.
In practical terms, fascism is simply the political wing of social darwinism - hence contempt for the weak and marginalised, and the overt glorification of expansionist narcissism on various spurious racial, financial, or religious grounds.
(There's also a rather obvious urge to self-destruction, but that's something I'll leave to the psychologists.)
So... stealing money is not fascism.
Stealing money from poor people while justifying it on the grounds of one's own specialness and ability to hover disdainfully over normal civilised norms certainly is - with extra points for blaming the weak while abusing them.
Interestingly, it seems that Schäuble's account of himself as a bulwark of reasonableness against the perfidy of the Cypriot establishment may be less than totally candid.
Is this true? Who knows.
Is it plausible? Unfortunately so.
Was in your opinion FDR a fascist? Some of his measures in 1933 were legally dubious and violated property rights.
FDR did tolerate vicious dictatorships in client states and noted of Somoza that 'he might be an SOB, but he was our SOB', and he was tolerant of white racism in the South as he wanted to retain 'The Solid South'. But, had he wished, he could have broken some of the leaders of major corporations over the Businessman's Plot, but didn't. And DuPont, IBM, Ford, etc. continued to do business with Hitler even after Pearl Harbor, though they at least had the grace to disguise their participation. Prescott Bush, father of GHW Bush, through Brown Harriman Bank, and the Dulles brothers Allen and John Foster, who went on to be CIA Director and Secretary of State, through Sullivan and Cromwell were both heavily involved in legal aspects of US corporations trading with Germany. Many of these relationships helped Germany and harmed the USA during WW II. Much of the leadership and sponsorship of the Republican Party from the 20s through the 50s were, during Hitler's time, tacitly pro-Nazi. They were FDR's political opponents.
"It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 23 13 comments
by Oui - Nov 26 10 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 20 20 comments
by epochepoque - Nov 16 32 comments
by gmoke - Nov 15
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 13 32 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 9 123 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 5 139 comments
by Oui - Nov 2610 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 2313 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 2020 comments
by epochepoque - Nov 1632 comments
by gmoke - Nov 15
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 1332 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 9123 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 5139 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 3215 comments
by IdiotSavant - Oct 314 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 29144 comments
by ARGeezer - Oct 2433 comments