The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
however, the wake does cause efficiency - as exemplified in cars driving in the wake of a car in front of theirs to minimize drag and wind resistance
What my brilliant possibility requires is either the ability to dither the wind direction back and forth by a few degrees or to rotate the array at a similar rate and I cannot imagine a feasible way to do that. I wrote before I thought. As the Dutch said while fighting the Spanish: "It is not necessary to have hope in order to persevere."
Reynolds number is the ratio of inertial forces to viscous forces
Laminar flow has a Reynolds number below 2000
Turbulent flow usually is somewhere above that because thtere is a transition state, it is not exactly at 2000
The Coefficient of Lift is defined as the lift force over the inertial forces so if the inertial forces are high (as in turbulent flow), the Coefficient of Lift is larger
The Coefficient of Drag on the other hand, is defned as the forces of drag over the viscous forces, so a lower Reynolds number (in laminar flow) would have more viscous forces and a higher Coefficient of Drag.
Therefore, turbulent flow should provide a more efficient ratio of Lift to Drag.
Is there data on the output power of successive generators back from the first?
Yes, there is, but the results are slightly counter-intuitive. From memory, the highest losses are in the second row, and decrease beyond that.
Distance between rows is typically longest in the prevailing wind conditions, not unsurprisingly - typically 7-8 rotor diameters. Wind power
The drop in efficiency has to do with the wind speed not the effect of turbulence.
by gmoke - Apr 22 4 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Apr 23 3 comments
by gmoke - Apr 30
by Oui - May 12
by Oui - May 119 comments
by Oui - May 11
by Oui - May 109 comments
by Oui - May 10
by Oui - May 921 comments
by Oui - May 9
by Oui - May 81 comment
by Oui - May 73 comments
by Oui - May 7
by Oui - May 63 comments
by Oui - May 61 comment
by Oui - May 5
by Oui - May 58 comments
by Oui - May 44 comments
by Oui - May 3
by Oui - May 21 comment
by Oui - May 1