Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Loose Equipment Cited In Train Crash in France - NYTimes.com

The crowded intercity train, leaving Paris at rush hour before a holiday weekend for the city of Limoges, jumped the tracks 20 miles south at Brétigny-sur-Orge station. The seven-car train split into two, with some cars riding up the station platform and flipping over.

Six people died, two were in critical condition and seven more were in serious condition, officials said; 21 others were still in the hospital. More than 190 people were treated at the site for lesser injuries.

Officials said the death toll might increase as the wreckage was removed because some people might be beneath the overturned cars.

Railway investigators discovered that a metal clip joining two rails as part of the switch, which guides trains from one track to another, had worked loose and disconnected from its normal position, said Pierre Izard, the director for infrastructure at the national rail company, S.N.C.F.

"It broke away, became detached and came out of its housing," Mr. Izard said at a news conference at the scene. "It moved into the center of the switch, and in this position it prevented the normal passage of the train's wheels and seems to have caused the derailment."

by Bernard (bernard) on Sat Jul 13th, 2013 at 12:29:00 PM EST
[ Parent ]
One thing to watch out for is mistranslations of the technical terminology, that may lead to misleading conclusions...

"...a metal clip joining two rails as part of the switch, which guides trains from one track to another, had worked loose and disconnected from its normal position, said Pierre Izard, the director for infrastructure at the national rail company, S.N.C.F. "It broke away, became detached and came out of its housing," Mr. Izard said at a news conference at the scene. "It moved into the center of the switch, and in this position it prevented the normal passage of the train's wheels" is pretty difficult to parse...

by asdf on Sun Jul 14th, 2013 at 09:03:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
It's just as difficult in French...
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Jul 14th, 2013 at 09:09:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The part concerned, "éclisse" in French, translated here as "clip", is properly a fishplate:

with four bolts as in this photo.

I heard this morning on public radio that they have found the four bolts, one whole, the three others sheared.

As to the language used by M. Izard, basically it means the fishplate fell off. How it then "moved into the centre of the switch" would seem, according to an explanation I've seen, to mean that, when the locomotive and first two carriages went over, the vibration caused the fishplate to flip or jump right into the points, causing the derailment.

Though they're still talking about a possible act of sabotage, it looks more like poor maintenance. The switch was inspected a month ago, apparently.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Jul 14th, 2013 at 09:57:58 AM EST
[ Parent ]
I suppose everybody has this buried in their subconsiousness (scene at 41:00):

by asdf on Sun Jul 14th, 2013 at 12:06:38 PM EST
[ Parent ]
If I deciphered similarly blurry reports right, the fishplate in question was of a type special to one type of switch: the so-called heeled switch, in which the rails that move (the point blades) are fixed to those that don't by loose fishplates. These fishplates may be exposed to stress if they are too tight. Also, the fishplate that got off apparently got stuck in the part where the left rail of the right direction and the right rail of the left direction cross (the frog).

On the photo below, you see those special fishplates on the right edge (on the middle two rails) and the frog in the middle.



*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Sun Jul 14th, 2013 at 12:30:02 PM EST
[ Parent ]
That looks like it. I saw a graphics-supported technical explanation by SNCF this evening. One of those fishplates (mid-right on your photo example) is thought to have pivoted upwards on the last bolt left intact (the one on the left) that then sheared, and the fishplate (10 kgs!) shot back into the frog.
by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Sun Jul 14th, 2013 at 04:14:58 PM EST
[ Parent ]
So the question is: what happened during that inspection a month earlier? (A) did they not inspect the fishplates, or (B) did they tighten the fishplate screws they way it should be at normal rail joints ( = too tight for a switch)?

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Mon Jul 15th, 2013 at 01:42:40 AM EST
[ Parent ]
That is indeed the question SNCF is looking into. Along with the possibility of sabotage.

SNCF is of course not responsible for the tracks and their maintenance, that's RFF (Réseau Ferré de France). Apparently SNCF and RFF do not see eye to eye.

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Jul 15th, 2013 at 02:05:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Real pics:

by afew (afew(a in a circle)eurotrib_dot_com) on Mon Jul 15th, 2013 at 12:09:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Oh, those photos explain a lot! So the fishplate was right next to the frog because this was a more complex switch, the double slip switch, which is essentially a crossing and four switches all in one. Here is an overview photo of such a switch in the heel-less version:

...and here is a very good photo of the central part of the heeled version (you can see all the rail joints):

This type of switch has no less than four frogs and eight point blades (against one frog and two blades for a simple switch). The accident was at the connection of one of the side frogs (those with the guard rail; about a third from top on the second photo) and one of the outer point blades (the ones that allow trains to go straight in the crossing directions when closed, as during the accident).

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Mon Jul 15th, 2013 at 02:10:06 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Actually, the double slip switch has another version in which there are four additional point blades instead of the two side frogs:

The accident wouldn't have happened in the above type of switch: the fishplate hanging by the single screw would have had room to pivot the full 180 degrees.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.

by DoDo on Mon Jul 15th, 2013 at 02:26:16 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Are you serious? I thought those were only used in very crowded yards. The model railroad guys love them because they are almost as complicated as a Shay or an articulated locomotive, but I thought they were mostly theoretical contraptions shown to railroad engineering students...
by asdf on Tue Jul 16th, 2013 at 01:58:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]
They are used at large junction stations with many platforms, too. I think I found the one in the accident on Google Maps; you'll see there are at least two others north and south of it.

*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Tue Jul 16th, 2013 at 05:50:17 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series