Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
Here the case seems clear that the private company wasn't used as a front but was hacked.

Tor (anonymity network) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In August 2013, it was discovered that the Firefox browsers in many older versions of the Tor Browser Bundle were vulnerable to a JavaScript attack, which was being exploited to send user's IP address and Windows computer name to the attackers. News reports linked this to an FBI operation targeting Freedom Hosting's owner, Eric Eoin Marques. He was arrested on a provisional extradition warrant issued by a US court on July 29. The FBI is seeking to extradite Marques to Maryland on four charges: distributing, conspiring to distribute and advertising child pornography - as well as aiding and abetting advertising of child pornography. The warrant alleges that Marques is "the largest facilitator of child porn on the planet."[42][43]


*Lunatic*, n.
One whose delusions are out of fashion.
by DoDo on Wed Aug 14th, 2013 at 02:29:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]
Assuming the FBI link is correct and the charges of distribution of child pornography are legitimate, how objectionable is the use of hacking by law enforcement organisations?
by Bjinse on Thu Aug 15th, 2013 at 06:06:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Breaking into your computer is about as objectionable as breaking into your home. If they had enough evidence ex ante to merit breaking into his home or his data, then they should also have had enough to get the French police to break into his home and make copies of his hard drives.

If they didn't have enough evidence to convince the French to break into his home and his computers, then they were effectively breaking in and then making up charges based on what they happened to find. That is a very objectionable practice: Any house you go through with a sufficiently fine-toothed comb will contain sufficient illegalities to retroactively justify breaking in.

But of course even that isn't what they did here. What they did here was to break into a whole apartment bloc, rummage through every apartment in the bloc, and then break the door locks on the way out. Without telling anybody that they had done it, or, as far as can be determined from available evidence, intending to notify any of the residents that they might want to check their locks once the operation was over.

Off the top of my head, I can't think of anything that doesn't produce megaton yields which would justify that sort of dragnet operation.

- Jake

Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.

by JakeS (JangoSierra 'at' gmail 'dot' com) on Thu Aug 15th, 2013 at 07:30:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]
Good use of PsyOps.  Hack into a distributor of child porn and widely publicize the fact.  This creates the subliminal equation:

Privacy Advocates = Child Porn

in people's minds.  

That may seem silly.  It is silly.  It also works.


She believed in nothing; only her skepticism kept her from being an atheist. -- Jean-Paul Sartre

by ATinNM on Thu Aug 15th, 2013 at 11:38:03 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series