Chemical Weapons and Moral Hypocrisy | 46 comments (46 topical, editorial, 0 hidden)

MoA is, sadly, not a reliable source. He's gone so anti-everything that it's impossible to filter out fact.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Sep 18th, 2013 at 01:11:28 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Nah, his problem is that at some point he started believing Assad's bullshit.
I'm not quoting him as an authority on anything though. It's a verifiable fact that all the environment samples at the first site turned out negative. I've also found no mention in the report whether the two missiles that were in condition to estimate a trajectory were tested on sarin.

by generic on Wed Sep 18th, 2013 at 01:54:49 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: On the other hand: (none / 1)

It seems he'll believe anything so long as it's anti-conventional wisdom, which isn't a great filter to have, since the people on the other side are often also vicious wankers.

by Colman (colman at eurotrib.com) on Wed Sep 18th, 2013 at 02:12:41 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: On the other hand: (none / 0)

Still, whatever he believes, he tries to make the best case for it he can. This one is quite solid.

by generic on Wed Sep 18th, 2013 at 03:21:34 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Take a look at ... (none / 1)

Brown Moses blog

'Sapere aude'

by Oui (Oui) on Wed Sep 18th, 2013 at 04:20:01 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Chemical Weapons and Moral Hypocrisy | 46 comments (46 topical, 0 editorial, 0 hidden)