The European Tribune is a forum for thoughtful dialogue of European and international issues. You are invited to post comments and your own articles.
Please REGISTER to post.
Suppose the domestic sector's $ liabilities of -λL$φ come suddenly due. Because the external stability condition ρR$ > λL$ is being maintained, the BCB can settle the liability with the external creditors in exchange for domestic BRL debt. The result is
The subscript T is in case we want to be generous to the domestic sector and not index the new debt to the dollar exchange rate but just vaue it at the exchange rate at the time of the rescue. In that case, the stock of new debt might well be written as
But, in any case, to be able to rescue the domestic economy from its foreign entanglements, the swaps position is irrelevant. It is true that the swap legs indexed to the dollar are a potentially domestically destabilising after a "successful" external rescue.
A society committed to the notion that government is always bad will have bad government. And it doesn't have to be that way. — Paul Krugman
Friends come and go. Enemies accumulate.
... Gersztein and Alday at BNP Paribas think a reasonable indication of the cost is to net out the central bank's short dollar position through currency swaps from its foreign reserves. After all, it is not only the stock of reserves but also the broader health of the Brazilian economy that affects its ability to pay its debts.
That is something investors may wish to keep a close eye on if, as widely predicted, the real continues to weaken and Brazil's fiscal position continues to deteriorate during 2014 and 2015.
I suppose that's the point the FT article is trying to make.
Clumsily and without focus. It appears the BCB is attempting to manage currency by playing with financial markets (which it can do) instead of dealing with the actual foundation of the currency, the domestic economy (which it can't), and is doing so with the acquiescence of the government, which doesn't want to deal with the economy either. Which supports your conclusion that they are simply manipulating money for the benefit of the moneyed.
by Migeru - Nov 17 9 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 14 91 comments
by Oui - Nov 13 30 comments
by ARGeezer - Nov 7 73 comments
by Oui - Nov 7 5 comments
by Oui - Nov 7 11 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 2 71 comments
by fjallstrom - Oct 31 5 comments
by Migeru - Nov 179 comments
by Oui - Nov 17
by Oui - Nov 152 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 1491 comments
by Oui - Nov 1330 comments
by Oui - Nov 132 comments
by Oui - Nov 9
by Oui - Nov 75 comments
by Oui - Nov 711 comments
by ARGeezer - Nov 773 comments
by Frank Schnittger - Nov 271 comments
by Oui - Nov 14 comments
by Oui - Oct 31
by fjallstrom - Oct 315 comments
by gmoke - Oct 302 comments
by Oui - Oct 29
by Frank Schnittger - Oct 2521 comments
by Oui - Oct 243 comments
by Oui - Oct 205 comments
by Oui - Oct 192 comments