Welcome to European Tribune. It's gone a bit quiet around here these days, but it's still going.
Display:
So you assume the veil had a nexus with "rejecting the authority of the state"

A statement such as "The school has no right to determine what my daughter should or should not wear. My religion is the only authority on that question" is typical of arguments of parents with respect to the issue.

This is consistent with a fundamentalist Islamic world view, which we both acknowledge exists in France. It is therefore empirically likely that rejection of state authority is among the motives of parents (though sophisticated parents will avoid advocating such a thing publicly). It is, in any case, logically impossible for you to prove the contrary.

But at least you no longer pretend your ban was about liberating women.
Oh, but I do.

It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II
by eurogreen on Thu Feb 6th, 2014 at 06:01:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The statement is entirely consistent with insistence on religious freedom, too. The school--which is compulsory--has no right to determine that children must violate rules of their religion. You deny that this conflict is existing, with your theory that veils had a nexus with Islamist-revolutionary intention (such a nexus is existing, but to which extent is pure guesswork).

If you still want to liberate women by banning their clothes, why not ban pleated skirts? You could liberate many more women with that.

by Katrin on Thu Feb 6th, 2014 at 06:52:51 AM EST
[ Parent ]
The statement is entirely consistent with insistence on religious freedom, too. The school--which is compulsory--has no right to determine that children must violate rules of their religion.

The school has no opinion on the religion of its students. It does not recognise, acklowledge or make concessions to anyone's religion, and is therefore incapable of determining that children must violate rules of their religion. That is religious neutrality.

The statement is certainly consistent with religious freedom, but goes far beyond it into religious privilege, by its insistence on the idea that in any conflict between the rules of the school and the rules of religion, religion must prevail.

It is rightly acknowledged that people of faith have no monopoly of virtue - Queen Elizabeth II

by eurogreen on Thu Feb 6th, 2014 at 07:03:44 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Display:

Occasional Series